News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Marcin
 - November 20, 2016, 21:18:45
Are you sure it is dual channel RAM installed?
Posted by rp
 - May 18, 2016, 17:03:52
Quote from: Lizard on March 02, 2016, 19:50:32
I lost
What is different between UX303UA and UX305UA with same configuration?
Both look like twins

Accordingly to the ASUS official page the difference is in type of RAM installed (see the respective "specs" section):
UX303UA uses DDR3L,
UX305UA uses LPDDR3
Posted by Lizard
 - March 02, 2016, 19:50:32
I lost
What is different between UX303UA and UX305UA with same configuration?
Both look like twins
Posted by trojanrobmc
 - March 02, 2016, 17:51:49
Can you please repost the image of the stress test? The values to the far right are missing...I want to see what the average CPU clock speed is. The article says it's at 1.4 Ghz...that would seem like some pretty heavy throttling.
Posted by andario
 - March 02, 2016, 16:47:30
Dang, I missed the no-backlight keyboard bit, which means no purchase, AGAIN.
Posted by andario
 - March 02, 2016, 16:44:34
A very nice machine, and a true improvement to the Macbook alternative, to me.

Pity about the hideous bezel, as per usual.
Posted by Redaktion
 - March 02, 2016, 07:18:38
Long-lasting. Skylake makes for a higher performance in the Zenbook UX305 without negative impact on the battery runtimes. The other features remained as good as previously: fast SSD, Full HD display, good keyboard.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305UA-FC040T-Subnotebook-Review.160621.0.html