What did Thomas Dunning write almost 200 years ago?:
"...Capital eschews no profit, or very small profit, just as Nature was formerly said to abhor a vacuum. With adequate profit, capital is very bold. A certain 10 per cent. will ensure its employment anywhere; 20 per cent. certain will produce eagerness; 50 per cent., positive audacity; 100 per cent. will make it ready to trample on all human laws; 300 per cent., and there is not a crime at which it will scruple, nor a risk it will not run, even to the chance of its owner being hunger. If turbulence and strife will bring a profit, it will freely encourage both. Smuggling and the slave-trade have amply proved all that is stated here."

When have capital owners acted differently? Most of them?

The system and laws are built as if the majority of the population and business are respectable, but what we see every day, throughout our lives, completely refutes this axiom.

Only the strictest control and the inevitability of punishment for misconduct, especially by large businesses and those who can influence the opinions and choices of the majority, can force them to act within a conscientious framework.

Once evil is allowed to germinate in one place, it metastasizes everywhere. This is a continuous struggle between civil activists and dishonest people and the structures they created. Once this layer disappears or becomes critically small, insufficient to maintain sufficient pressure on the bad layer of the population and business, politicians, and it's all over from the point of view of the development of civilization. And this layer of people has recently been carefully weeded out by villains of all stripes in all countries, with the indifferent observation of the majority of the population...

Apple has continually proven that it is a dishonest company at the management level. Like Intel, like Google, like most everyone else.

Oof, not good. First, because it was reported to Apple back in December and they still didn't do anything to address it. Second, because of this:

Quote"We're talking about high-end users, like someone who has a cryptocurrency wallet with a lot of money," he says. But he notes that in theory this attack might be used to break the TLS cryptography that a computer's browser uses to encrypt communication between their computer and web sites, which could allow attackers to decrypt that communication to extract a user's session cookie for their Gmail or other web-based email account and use it to log into the account as them. "I'm not saying it's a practical attack I'm just saying that's the kind of threat you might be worried about," he says, "You can get [other] very high-valued keys potentially" including their iCloud keys to access backed up data. The researchers reported the issue to Apple in December, but other than thanking them for their work, Genkin says Apple didn't indicate what, if anything, it might do to address the problem.

QuoteIt's also theoretically possible for an attacker to pull this off by embedding malicious code into Javascript on a web site so that when a computer with an M-series chip visits the site, the attacker's malicious code can conduct the attack to grab data from the cache. The researchers didn't test a web site attack, but Green says the scenario is plausible. It would also be a more concerning attack, he notes, because attackers could scale it to attack thousands of computers quickly.

This is huge.

All of these holes found are similar to the "Dieselgate" scam.

At first, fraudulent chip manufacturers (here in particular Apple) deliberately (I am 100% sure of this) introduce security holes into the circuits in order to speed up the operation of the chips compared to competitors or simply to demonstrate a significant (for future buyers) increase in performance in the new series, which in reality, with conscientious development taking into account all levels of security, simply would not exist. And when they, the manufacturers of such chips with fake security, have sold millions of these chips and profits have already been made, unpleasant facts emerge (most often in a "controlled manner").

In the case of dieselgate, bringing the emission level of cars to official standards leads to a sharp loss of torque and engine power below that declared by the manufacturer. Which is officially considered fraud and requires compensation for each buyer. Please note that the automotive industry has safety regulations. which manufacturers are prohibited from violating at the official level, but in IT there are still no such standards and no official punishment for their non-compliance. How convenient, right?

As a result, fraudulent IT manufacturers do not suffer seriously in any way after their fraud in chip development is discovered, because There are no minimum safety standards at the official level.

I'm wondering why the authorities, at least the United States, have not yet filed class action lawsuits against chip manufacturers? After all, only powerful losses in the event of large fines in favor of each buyer and the state will force the owners of manufacturers to choose the right management and create a healthy environment for the development of new series.

And we are all seeing the same thing now with Boeing.

This is a general degradation of the integrity of American business. His greed and dishonesty (look at how many of your companies continue to conduct business in Russia brazenly in full view of the whole world) has crossed all boundaries.