News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by RobertJasiek
 - March 21, 2024, 11:37:40
Quote from: Robert Sarkis-Karapetians on March 21, 2024, 10:58:02I am very happy greatful for the correcting of this mistake in the astastrophysiks.

It is an interesting theory but, in its current form, far from correcting what might be a major mistake in astrophysics. Rather, it is a theory that might be worked out and, if it stands, then serve this purpose.
Posted by Robert Sarkis-Karapetians
 - March 21, 2024, 10:58:02
Dear collegs,

I am nuclear astrophysicist and I have never accepted the theory of dark matter or even dark Energy...
The Gravitation redshift is for Qasars the highest... and therefor is the light from there much stronger shifted in the red spektrum, because the time shifting was 14 billion years ago other in the Activ Galaxy Nucleis (denser) that results the shifting of wavelenth.

I have Worte my astrophysical thesis with Max-Plank-Institute for radioastronomy in Germany/Bonn about central engine of AGNs

I am very happy greatful for the correcting of this mistake in the astastrophysiks. Thank you.

Best regards
Robert S. Karapetians
Posted by Redaktion
 - March 19, 2024, 13:57:55
27 Milliarden Jahre könnte das Universum alt sein, sollte es doch keine dunkle Materie geben. Dann würde sich auch Licht anders verhalten als gedacht, und ein paar alte Theorien hätten erneut Gültigkeit.

https://www.notebookcheck.com/Doch-keine-Dunkle-Materie-Muedes-Licht-und-viel-aelteres-Universum.814670.0.html