Quote from: NikoB on March 25, 2024, 15:20:38This 400% zoom in paint from fake "400%" from Neenyah - imgur.com/mx24l3S:
imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg

Here is a screenshot 400% of the correct black and white anti-aliasing, already enlarged by 400% in paint:
imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd

imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg seems to look better though than imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd, no?

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:45:35Hahaha, stupid Neenyah doesn't see the incorrect black and white anti-aliasing in his screenshots.

The question is, how many idiots on the planet don't see this, but normal people do too?

I asked this moron to post a screenshot enlarged by 400% in paint, but he didn't do it. But you can easily use his link to copy the image and paste it into paint, enlarge it 4 times and you will immediately see shadows around the letters, which should not exist with the correct black-and-white anti-aliasing method.

Q.E.D. =)

This 400% zoom in paint from fake "400%" from Neenyah - imgur.com/mx24l3S:
imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg

Here is a screenshot 400% of the correct black and white anti-aliasing, already enlarged by 400% in paint:
imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd

Anyone who doesn't see the difference in how text is rendered and where it's correct is a pure test of a person's imbecility.

www.theverge.com/2024/3/25/24111273/microsoft-google-chrome-text-rendering-improvements

These M$ are doing everything wrong again. It is necessary not only to remove the moronic Skia rendering (which I had previously disabled by tuning FF up to version 69), but also to generally disable the incorrect greyscale anti-aliasing, restoring the only correct one - just like in XP WITHOUT using the lousy color anti-aliasing with CleatType!

Look what's happening - the morons (or rather villains) at Google have ruined the rendering in Chrome. In M$, even on the old engine, they also ruined everything. Even the Mozilla developers messed up text rendering in FF, starting with version 69, but they at least had the conscience to leave a key in the registry that allows you to disable cloudy anti-aliasing altogether, which I have been using for years in FF, reading texts only in it. And now, as an achievement, they disable the previously non disabled Skia rendering in favor of other methods! But they are still not going to restore the correct grayscale anti-aliasing from XP!

I can already see how, with fanfare and fiery speeches, the management of M$ will return to Chromium for W12 the old grayscale rendering, as in XP, the only true one for human vision, and will call this return SUPER progress! Great achievement...

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 12:58:36Everyone who checked my statement already knows exactly who is crazy here. =)

Finally something smart from you, I agree with that and you just described yourself, heck you are even confused about your own situation:

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 12:58:36I don't understand how such insane people are released from hospitals.

...but hey, that's a good benefit of Russia, no? 😉 You loons can just roam around freely considering small population numbers in relation to its size.

Quote from: Neenyah on March 09, 2024, 11:59:05Oh yeah? And check this image from this article, you living turd (also keep ignoring image compression by all image hosts), 1600x1200 originally posted:

You moron (as and moron "imao") should have been treated by professional psychiatrists for a long time. I don't understand how such insane people are released from hospitals. Everyone who checked my statement already knows exactly who is crazy here. =)

Quote from: lmao on March 09, 2024, 12:31:41haven't you noticed it before, when he fucks up he is counting 15 messages and writes enough messages to start a new page, then he writes unrelated stuff in hopes that no one reads the page before. when he doesn't f*** up (too much) he writes on other threads so that thread just goes to the second page in threads list - and this is what he's going to do now after you've spoiled his plan. coming up, million forum threads with nonsense.
not the first time i encounter people like this, absolutely typical schizo.

Yep, nicely noticed and well said, exactly that's the case with him 👍

Quote from: Neenyah on March 09, 2024, 11:59:05The clown just quickly typed a ton of new irrelevant spam, impressive.

haven't you noticed it before, when he fucks up he is counting 15 messages and writes enough messages to start a new page, then he writes unrelated stuff in hopes that no one reads the page before. when he doesn't f*** up (too much) he writes on other threads so that thread just goes to the second page in threads list - and this is what he's going to do now after you've spoiled his plan. coming up, million forum threads with nonsense.
not the first time i encounter people like this, absolutely typical schizo.

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:57:20can easily independently verify that

can easily independently verify that you don't even know what calibration is and that you are looking at the screen with destroyed color accuracy right now

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:57:20This eliminates the need for most AMD card owners to purchase a hardware calibrator

lmao no, idiot, nothing can replace hardware calibrator

and actually we were just discussing your other failure

Quote from: NikoB on March 04, 2024, 19:23:27when running on battery power, you can switch to fhd@60Hz mode instead of 4k and dramatically increase battery life

that haven't passed reality check

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:45:35This 400% zoom in paint from fake "400%" from Neenyah - imgur.com/mx24l3S:
imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg

Here is a screenshot 400% of the correct black and white anti-aliasing, already enlarged by 400% in paint:
imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd

You really love to lie, don't you? Here is my image enlarged 400% in Paint: https://imgur.com/a/q7vKML6

The guy is even lying in and for screenshots 💀💀💀

Now the s*** you posted: https://imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd

You call this good when resized back to 100-150%: https://imgur.com/rOjcaKV ?? 😂

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:45:35Anyone who doesn't see the difference in how text is rendered and where it's correct is a pure test of a person's imbecility.

You need a good ophthalmologists, go see one if they still exist in Russia.

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:45:35Hahaha, stupid Neenyah doesn't see the incorrect black and white anti-aliasing in his screenshots.

Oh yeah? And check this image from this article, you living turd (also keep ignoring image compression by all image hosts), 1600x1200 originally posted: https://www.notebookcheck.net/fileadmin/_processed_/5/3/csm_IMG_2546_47fe8c4124.jpg

But then the same image resized to 400%, so 6400x4800: https://i.imgur.com/kTyZ2Qv.png (https://imgur.com/kTyZ2Qv)

OMFG, Huawei is selling incorrect laptop with incorrect antialiasing!!! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
You really are a fucking retard who can't differentiate vector and bitmap/raster. Plus the fact that you have a 56% sRGB 220 nits 1080p screen 🤡🤡

Edit: The clown just quickly typed a ton of new irrelevant spam, impressive.

About the same, the morons Neenyah and Imao fucked up the entire forum with lies that AMD does not have an autocalibrator in sRGB, although any owner of an AMD video card (or igpu) on screens with 45-46% NTSC and 80%+ NTSC (for example 90%+ DCI-P3/90 %+ AdobeRGB), can easily independently verify that I'm right and be convinced of the total disgrace of NVidia and Intel for more than 16 years, which do not have this autocalibrator and whose hardware owners cannot quickly (albeit roughly, depends on the EDID) provide color rendition in sRGB space. Moreover, in all software, except for the component output in players, you always need to select RGB24/32 output.

This eliminates the need for most AMD card owners to purchase a hardware calibrator (although this is the most accurate calibration, it does not apply to all Windows software, because some of the software knows nothing about color management and thinks that it draws a picture in the sRGB space). So, the sRGB autocalibrator built into all AMD drivers has been doing this work for them for more than 16 years, albeit roughly, but the result is many times better than looking at poisonous and oversaturated colors if the laptop screen or monitor does not have the correct factory sRGB converting profile on-the-fly color space of wide gamut panels in sRGB.

And all this with one regulator in the driver. To the shame of Intel/NVidia, they have not been able to do this for more than 16 years.

I just installed NVidia 2024 drivers and there is 100% no autocalibrator for EDID, which is in AMD 2024 drivers. =)

Shame on NVidia. Shame on Intel!

Hahaha, stupid Neenyah doesn't see the incorrect black and white anti-aliasing in his screenshots.

The question is, how many idiots on the planet don't see this, but normal people do too?

I asked this moron to post a screenshot enlarged by 400% in paint, but he didn't do it. But you can easily use his link to copy the image and paste it into paint, enlarge it 4 times and you will immediately see shadows around the letters, which should not exist with the correct black-and-white anti-aliasing method.

Q.E.D. =)

This 400% zoom in paint from fake "400%" from Neenyah - imgur.com/mx24l3S:
imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg

Here is a screenshot 400% of the correct black and white anti-aliasing, already enlarged by 400% in paint:
imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd

Anyone who doesn't see the difference in how text is rendered and where it's correct is a pure test of a person's imbecility.

Turn off TrueType and enjoy your Minecraft-ish text then.

Quote from: NikoB on March 09, 2024, 11:12:50I'm sure there won't be a substantive answer,

Yes, there won't, because I'm not a retard (unlike you) to use my 1440p laptop or a 4K desktop magnified at 400%. Got one other 1440p monitor but that's exclusively for CS2 (because of 240 Hz) so whatever...

Edit: Hold up, even at 400% it looks clean and nice: https://imgur.com/mx24l3S

You enjoy your BITMAP image upscaling, lmao, while text is being vector. Funny how you suggest that but you call DLSS to be a scam.

Quote from: Neenyah on March 08, 2024, 22:17:08

Quote from: NikoB on March 08, 2024, 22:06:28Especially considering that font smoothing has been incorrect in Chrome and other browsers for many years, which is easily proven by screenshots.

Blablabla...

Moron, give me a screenshot of this stupid answer of yours at 400% magnification in Paint, taking a screenshot from Chrome and enlarging it by 400% and posting it on a file hosting service..

I'm sure there won't be a substantive answer, because you're 100% a moron, like Imao.

Quote from: hater on March 09, 2024, 01:27:40are most people using their laptops to idle at a desktop or watch a screensaver? why test at idle? not a realistic scenario imo. better to use battery runtimes of wifi web browsing tests.

i don't have a 100% standartized load test that i can 100% repeat, so i have to just use idle

Quote from: hater on March 09, 2024, 01:27:40Depends on machine. On MBPs reducing brightness can gives up to double the battery but on the G14 2024 OLED it only gains +2 hrs (7 hrs on max brightness -> 9 hrs @ 150 nits) according to nbc's wifi web browsing tests.

"only 2 hrs" is actually +29%

Quote from: hater on March 09, 2024, 01:27:40Nobody said this

nikob said this, that's why the whole conversation took place:

Quote from: NikoB on March 04, 2024, 19:23:27when running on battery power, you can switch to fhd@60Hz mode instead of 4k and dramatically increase battery life

it didn't pass reality check even with more difficult cases like external monitors and different panels

Quote from: lmao on March 08, 2024, 17:24:05idle

are most people using their laptops to idle at a desktop or watch a screensaver? why test at idle? not a realistic scenario imo. better to use battery runtimes of wifi web browsing tests.

Quote from: lmao on March 08, 2024, 17:24:05how much were you going to same on milliWatts if you can just lower screen brightness and save Watts.

Depends on machine. On MBPs reducing brightness can gives up to double the battery but on the G14 2024 OLED it only gains +2 hrs (7 hrs on max brightness -> 9 hrs @ 150 nits) according to nbc's wifi web browsing tests.

Quote from: lmao on March 08, 2024, 16:40:27proof that "4 more pixels = 4 times more work = 4 times more power consumption" isn't a thing

Nobody said this, but I do not consider a difference of 45% in power consumption to be trivial.

Quote from: lmao on March 08, 2024, 16:40:274K has touchscreen

True. 4k non-touch variants are not as common and probably does account for some additional power usage.

Quote from: lmao on March 08, 2024, 16:40:27keep in mind, it's a bad iris plus gpu that is maybe times weaker than modern igpus

agreed.

That xps 13 9300 nbc link you gave is an interesting one. Quite a rare exception for 4k and fhd variants to be that close to one another.

Here is one where it is the complete opposite: notebookcheck.net/Power-hungry-display-Dell-XPS-13-4K-UHD-configurations-have-shorter-battery-life-by-several-hours.414493.0.html (Another 4k touch, I know)

Quote from: lmao on March 08, 2024, 23:03:40at least now we know who taught steve jobs about retina

True 😁