It's only fitting and obvious that Samsung exynos 2400 is both weaker and inferior to Qualcomm snapdragon 8 gen 3. Remember the Google pixel phones powered by the Google-samsung partnership custom tensor chip which proved to be lackluster and weaker and inferior to Qualcomm was basically a exynos chip but renamed to tensor.

Quote from: AliJan on January 18, 2024, 08:28:24Can you tell us how is the "playing field equal"? It's S24 vs S24 Ultra. Different cooling solutions, even different RAM values? Don't you know nothing about how smartphones and benchmarks work?

That's the only reference  we've got now at this point but they could write the post clearer.

Don't forget that the Exynos is in much smaller s24 with much worse cooling system than the Ultra.
I guess, S24 plus Exynos vs Snapdragon will be a fair battle.

Any heating of the battery above 37C leads to its accelerated degradation. But the rich kids-players have their own quirks. Why should an adult play on a smartphone? Ask yourself this is the key question?

what a disgrace of a test. those are different phones. you cant conclude one lags behind other with this...

good, so exynos is 43 degrees after antutu, while snapdragon is 38 degrees.
that's all we need to know

Can you tell us how is the "playing field equal"? It's S24 vs S24 Ultra. Different cooling solutions, even different RAM values? Don't you know nothing about how smartphones and benchmarks work?