And what is "impressive" in this screen, the author?

Lousy sRGB color rendering, where is AdobeRGB 95%/100% DCI-P3? For such a price, the buyer has the right to expect exactly the same screen as Asus laptops.

The contrast is so-so - again, for this price, the buyer expects 1500:1+. And I would like LG Black IPS c 2000:1.

ppi isn't high enough to completely eliminate problems with murky, non-disableable fonts in Chrome. You need at least 220-230 ppi to radically solve this problem with shadows around characters due to incorrect black and white or color anti-aliasing. And only a 4k@120Hz panel gives that much, which, moreover, would allow playing in the most sharp fhd mode at the pixel level, which a 2.5k panel cannot give. We play fhd, we work in 4k.

The speed of the panel is disgustingly high - again fake "240Hz", but really about 110Hz, i.e. 2 times worse.

Actual memory bandwidth could be better optimized for writing and copying. In read only mode, it is close in speed to the theoretical limit of ddr5 5600.

Well, the rest is not much to discuss.

For the price, you can get a desktop with the 7950H+4080, which is guaranteed to be faster, and a high-end laptop to go along with it. I would do just that - a quiet vengeful desktop and laptop to relax with it on the sofa / bed with surf and take it somewhere if necessary. Why suffer with such noise in games, I don't understand, but this model will probably find such eccentrics. The world is big, 8 billion people already, there are enough cranks with money to sell almost anything...

"wie bei High-End-Notebooks leider üblich – eine sehr hohe Temperatur- und Geräuschentwicklung unter Last."

Der Textbaustein wird durch Wiederholung nicht wahr. Volllast-Lärmwert bei einem Gegenbeispiel unter den Notebooks mit 4090:

48dB    Asus Strix G18

Es gibt weitere Notebooks mit 4090, die unter Volllast einen Lärmbereich in Abhängigkeit von Lüftersettings bieten, die bei 46, 50 oder 51 anfangen. Hoch, meinetwegen, aber "sehr hoch" ist eine falsche Karakterisierung.