Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by NikoB

- April 23, 2023, 10:51:18

Xiaomi, like Huawei, is listed as a sponsor of the war by Ukraine - they have no place with their goods in the Western world, like all Chinese goods.

The same can be said about all goods from India...

Posted by Shaolin

- April 23, 2023, 08:32:23

They're getting paid by Samsung or Apple just to trash the phone it's lame! This website is s***!

Posted by S.Yu

- April 21, 2023, 20:46:44

Thought as much...at least the display is generally used at a low brightness.

Posted by Ricci Rox

- April 21, 2023, 16:44:42

Quote from: Mdc on April 21, 2023, 16:04:42Couldn't make any sense of this article as it's riddled with typo's. "At 100nits that's 350 nits" what?? Are these even proofread before a kid writes it

Author here. What typos are you talking about exactly?

That line reads "While both are neck-in-neck at 100 nits, by 350 nits, the E6 on the 13 Pro shows an efficiency advantage..."

Posted by Mdc

- April 21, 2023, 16:04:42

Couldn't make any sense of this article as it's riddled with typo's. "At 100nits that's 350 nits" what?? Are these even proofread before a kid writes it

Posted by Redaktion

- April 21, 2023, 00:03:37

The Xiaomi 13 Ultra and its Huaxing C7 display have now been tested by Chinese outlet Xiaobai Evaluation. While the flagship boasts of the brightest display on a smartphone yet, brighter isn't necessarily better. It's, for sure, not more efficient, at least.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Xiaomi-13-Ultra-Tests-show-worse-display-efficency-than-the-Xiaomi-13-Pro.708582.0.html