News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by heffeque
 - March 16, 2023, 00:17:33
Quote from: Anonymousgg on March 15, 2023, 19:29:14At this point, the memory speed needs to be known or the result is worthless. It should top out at around LPDDR5X-7500.

Stlll, there should be a modest gain over Rembrandt, and RDNA 3+ in Strix Point should be amazing even if it's another incremental gain.
Agreed.
DDR5-4800 is surely not going to perform as well as LPDDR5X-7500, especially on GPU tasks.
Posted by Anonymousgg
 - March 15, 2023, 19:29:14
At this point, the memory speed needs to be known or the result is worthless. It should top out at around LPDDR5X-7500.

Stlll, there should be a modest gain over Rembrandt, and RDNA 3+ in Strix Point should be amazing even if it's another incremental gain.
Posted by Redaktion
 - March 15, 2023, 18:57:30
This Geekbench test was performed on a 2.7 GHz Radeon 780M integrated with the Ryzen 7 7840HS APU, but there also is a 2.8 GHz version on the Ryzen 9 7940H that could come close to an Nvidia GTX 1650 Ti laptop dGPU.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-s-Radeon-780M-iGPU-beats-the-Nvidia-GTX-1650-Max-Q-laptop-dGPU-in-new-Geekbench-test.701261.0.html