News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by heffeque
 - February 11, 2023, 13:55:18
Also don't forget that it includes an AI chip, which might come in handy sooner or later (who knows).
Personally waiting for Minisforum to use this chip and buy one as soon as it's out.
Posted by Räuber Hotz
 - February 11, 2023, 11:36:44
QuoteOn the GPU side, the Radeon 780M inside the APU scored a rating of 44.3% which is roughly on par with a desktop RX 570 and slightly behind the GTX 1060 Mobile (46.7%).

Sounds too good to be true. Especially since the recent Timespy Leak showed 3000 points (780m) vs 3700 points (gtx1060).

I have a feeling that the user-benchmark-score profits from dual-issue, and thus it can calculate some theoretical s*** (such as FP32 performance) faster and come close to the gtx1060. However it's a whole other story when it comes to gaming. We don't have any comparison to that yet, so I'm still not sure how it will turn out...
Posted by Puiu
 - February 11, 2023, 09:06:30
for crying out loud, stop giving that website free advertising. it's just stupid to make such articles based on results taken from there.

why are you dragging your reputation through the mud? for a few extra clicks?
Posted by geekinasuit
 - February 10, 2023, 01:48:55
The more outlandish userbenchmark's bias becomes can be used as a reliable indicator of how well AMD is performing vs Intel, i.e., userbenchmark's bias is by itself a kind of benchmark.
Posted by Anonymousgg
 - February 10, 2023, 00:14:10
Quoteit is important to mention that UserBenchmark is a contentious platform and accused by many of favoring Intel parts over AMD.

The linked 7940HS result literally calls it "AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 7940HS" and "AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 780M". So it's a safe bet that UserCringemark is not to be taken seriously.
Posted by deksman2
 - February 09, 2023, 19:47:06
I'm a tad confused.
How can it be rated higher than 5950x but 6% behind desktop 7600?

Me thinks, there's a bit of a loss of information/context.

7940HS is an 8c/16th CPU.
There's no way it can be more powerful than 5950x in real world software under multi-threaded operations (especially with 55W TDP).
I think the score is skewed because of AVX-512 in that regard.
6% lower single threaded score than desktop 7600 makes sense though.

The iGP being on par with RX 570... that might be possible.

But, UserBenchmark is a joke and not something that should EVER be used to compare hardware.

I'd rather wait for third party reviews where this APU is put through its paces under real life conditions and software.
Posted by Redaktion
 - February 09, 2023, 12:39:11
The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is the flagship "Phoenix" APU combining a Zen 4 CPU and an RDNA 3 Radeon 780M iGPU. An HP EliteBook 865 G10 has now made an appearance on UserBenchmark depicting that the Ryzen 9 7940HS inside the laptop is significantly more powerful than the Ryzen 9 6900HX and can even outperform the Core i9-12900H.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Impressive-AMD-Ryzen-9-7940HS-Phoenix-APU-speeds-past-the-Core-i9-12900HK-and-the-Ryzen-9-6900HX-on-UserBenchmark.692254.0.html