News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by S.Yu
 - February 03, 2023, 18:52:50
Quote from: RobertJasiek on February 03, 2023, 08:22:13
Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 03, 2023, 01:58:12But those qualified drivers for the Quadro are worth $1000 alone.

Why? It may be the price Nvidia demands but why do you think it is justified?
They're only worth what people are willing to pay, and obviously professionals have deep pockets.
Posted by RobertJasiek
 - February 03, 2023, 08:22:13
Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 03, 2023, 01:58:12But those qualified drivers for the Quadro are worth $1000 alone.

Why? It may be the price Nvidia demands but why do you think it is justified?
Posted by Mr Majestyk
 - February 03, 2023, 01:58:12
But those qualified drivers for the Quadro are worth $1000 alone.
Posted by Redaktion
 - February 03, 2023, 00:51:56
A Redditor posted Time Spy scores from an RTX 6000 workstation GPU. The RTX 6000 sports a near-complete AD102 die with 18,176 CUDA cores and managed scores that are about 15% lower than an average RTX 4090 (after a Windows update) albeit at a lower 300 W TDP with a blower-style cooler.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-RTX-6000-with-18-176-CUDA-cores-and-300-W-TDP-15-slower-than-RTX-4090-in-3DMark-Time-Spy.689737.0.html