News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Shame for the Author
 - January 08, 2023, 17:17:49
Author should be ashamed posting this nonsense opinion of an article.
Posted by NikoB
 - January 07, 2023, 10:00:53
It is necessary, at the level of European laws and in the USA, to prohibit the consumption of laptops more than 50-60W in total. And spin guys manufacturers as best you can with such a restriction on consumption. And then these liars will no longer cheat with the wildest increase in TDP and monstrous 250W+ power supplies on laptops. And they will stop lying to the naive illiterate public about the fact that "Moore's law" is still alive. Here you will have a limit of 50-60W for all the hardware of the laptop, then tell tales about performance growth that will not happen, And no one will buy your overpriced rubbish without real performance growth. And then all laptops will become quiet. =)
Posted by Peter P
 - January 07, 2023, 09:49:22
And this post written by Senior Tech writer. Shame...
Posted by Russel
 - January 06, 2023, 20:17:25
Quote from: Intel biased on January 06, 2023, 13:57:34
QuoteAMD's current-gen Zen 4-based laptops could narrow that gap a little, but Intel seems to be quite ahead of the pack, at least for now.
So sure that AMD's Zen 4 in laptops will just close the gap? And A LITTLE. Based on Geekbench scores of a CPU that can use 157W.


Looking at the other anti AMD post you did (can't call these big posts articles, they are NOT articles, they are fanboy opinions with misleading titles) I feel justified for rarely visiting this garbage of site.

JMO

You mean intel sponsored? XD
Posted by Intel biased
 - January 06, 2023, 13:57:34
QuoteAMD's current-gen Zen 4-based laptops could narrow that gap a little, but Intel seems to be quite ahead of the pack, at least for now.
So sure that AMD's Zen 4 in laptops will just close the gap? And A LITTLE. Based on Geekbench scores of a CPU that can use 157W.


Looking at the other anti AMD post you did (can't call these big posts articles, they are NOT articles, they are fanboy opinions with misleading titles) I feel justified for rarely visiting this garbage of site.

JMO
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 06, 2023, 13:39:53
Intel's recently announced Core i5-13500HX processor scored 1,711 points on Geekbench's single-core test and 11,319 on the multi-core test. Both figures are remarkably higher than that of the last-gen flagship Zen 3 chip, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, which, on average, scored 1,564 and 9,863 points on the benchmark.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i5-13500HX-outperforms-the-AMD-Ryzen-9-6900HX-on-Geekbench.679719.0.html