News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by BigT
 - September 04, 2022, 17:13:46
ROFL....is it April....because this author is playing an April fool's joke on us. Also the Intel 13th gen is 3 generations ahead of AMD 5000 series so if intel didn't "thrash AMD" Intel needs to quit making processors.....lol
Posted by NighTWolF
 - September 04, 2022, 13:07:32
Tendetialy written or payed article. Comparing previous generation 2 years old CPU with unreleased new generation? This must be a joke or author is a stupid millenial adolescent without knowledge of technical differences between architectures.

Lets compare 7series of AMD CPU's with latest i9 to see the real competition...
Posted by Aron
 - September 04, 2022, 11:31:59
Quote from: Abdulwaleed on September 01, 2022, 11:06:02Yo Murtaza, when you gonna do a comparison of the 13900 with an Egyptian abacus? We're looking forward to it!

Thank you!!
Your comment made my day, I literally laughed so hard, I was almost crying :-)
Posted by Lionel
 - September 04, 2022, 08:04:18
Actually writing a message to say due to this article I will be blocking this site from my news feed ...

This is beyond stupid, anyone with a modicum of tech knowledge will know how much garbage this is, I expect you were either -
A. Paid well.
B. Actually believe the comparison.
Neither bodes well for your journalistic credentials.
Posted by Joseph
 - September 03, 2022, 11:04:27
I literally lol'ed when the author doesn't even know how DDR memory works. Memory clocked at 2400 MHz is 4800 MT/s.
Posted by xseven
 - September 03, 2022, 06:14:40
Intel 11th gen is the competitor.

486DX2-66 trashes 386SX-33

Posted by Greg
 - September 02, 2022, 20:55:51
Who's writing these articles. How much did Intel pay for this stupid struggle comparing 2.5 year old processor to a new one that hasn't even released yet. What morons
Posted by Mister No
 - September 02, 2022, 05:17:51
Wnat a pile of not comparable crap. 🤣
Posted by Abdulwaleed
 - September 01, 2022, 11:06:02
Yo Murtaza, when you gonna do a comparison of the 13900 with an Egyptian abacus? We're looking forward to it!
Posted by Mr Majestyk
 - September 01, 2022, 09:45:14
So a 24 core, 2 year newer and much higher clocked cpu thrashes an 8 core and 16 core cpu. Ok roger that Captain obvious.
Posted by JSA
 - September 01, 2022, 04:24:50
Invalid comparison old lower speed gen AMD vs newer Intel well said Joe B
Posted by Joe B
 - September 01, 2022, 01:29:05
Does the person who wrote think that this is even close to a valid comparison?  Yes obviously this is going to beat the 2 year old AMD processors with 1/3 the core count.  Who expected those to keep up?  If you guys are looking for a writer who finished high school shoot me an email.
Posted by Mustq
 - August 30, 2022, 18:59:47
At 2124 it is slower than 7600X at 2175. How is this a good news again? =)
Posted by Lol
 - August 30, 2022, 15:28:44
Wow ! New is better than old ! What a world we lived in.
Posted by Yes
 - August 30, 2022, 12:08:17
Amazing, new gen better than old. xD