News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Abc
 - February 15, 2023, 22:14:45
I'm sorry actually NotebookCheck was quick to review this phone. I read the dates wrong.
Posted by Abc
 - February 15, 2023, 22:11:22
The link is 80% if the time wrong on review sites. It's nothing new. A lot of reviewed models are not officially sold in the US/ whichever country you're in, so a lot of listings are made by third party sellers, and they can change anything at any time. They can change it to a completely different product tomorrow. It's to be blamed on Amazon having a bad marketplace.

This phone itself is great. Samsung has a sale last year at $509 during the holiday season. As always NotebookCheck reviews are usually a few months after the initial introduction. (In this case 7 months late)

Samsung doesn't want you to learn this phone exists. It wants you to buy S models and A5x models that has no jack or replaceable batteries. 90% of Samsung users never heard of this phone. 
Posted by jmichael2497
 - February 14, 2023, 02:03:38
reminder the USA version is only single sim plus esim.

who is placing your shopping links? they are still wrong, and now looking at first one, it is pointing to entirely different device, not even the old series versions, why?

for those in USA looking for unlocked direct versions from Samsung or in their cramazon page, they are listed at full $600 price.
Posted by LukeBM
 - October 26, 2022, 11:37:51
I'm a little confused by the sentence on Bluetooth codecs:

QuoteHowever, only aptX is available for wireless connection, not the more modern variants. In return, you get Samsung's own Scalable Codec, AAC, SBC and LDAC.

Is only aptX available? Or is there also e.g. LDAC and its supported bitrates? Thanks!
Posted by krafty
 - September 15, 2022, 21:45:13
Heads up as I believe you linked the old Amazon US model in the "Price and Availability" section.
Posted by Hans Fenneberg
 - August 30, 2022, 08:39:06
By the way front protection is Gorilla Glass Victus Plus.

Which is a stronger glass than Victus.

Posted by Hans Fenneberg
 - August 29, 2022, 15:45:48
I have had this xcover6 pro since July, and its fast and no problem with call quality.

It is a fantastic mobile, a great improvement over the Xcover Pro I had for the last 30 month.
Posted by jmichael2497
 - August 26, 2022, 23:51:47
since my parents are complaining about poor call audio quality on Moto x4 running LOS, and i was hoping to get this for maybe all of us...

what is the possibility the call issue was mobile network carrier issue (did you try multiple carriers?), correctable software issue, defective or damaged test unit?

(i really don't want to have to try to find something with similar long term support and repairability on short notice)
Posted by sla
 - August 24, 2022, 07:15:15
Good review, very comprehensive, thank you
Posted by Nameless
 - August 24, 2022, 05:27:24
The US Amazon listing claims to be the "2022 model", but it seems to be for the older Xcover Pro from 2020.
Posted by Redaktion
 - August 22, 2022, 12:20:31
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a water- and dustproof smartphone that has been simply designed without annoying rubber flaps over the jacks. With modern ports and a replaceable battery, it should also be a decent smartphone for everyday use, right?

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-XCover-6-Pro-revew-Lightweight-outdoor-smartphone-with-power.642009.0.html