News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Johnhunter
 - June 12, 2023, 21:47:11
Quote from: anon999999 on February 22, 2022, 01:45:10Would it be possible to stop saying that the lack of PWM or high PWM frequency is not a problem? My g100 does not produce any eye strain with brightness over 65 %, but this G200 causes instant severe eye strain at any brightness levels.

At the forums there are many like me. It seems that they introduced FRC or dithering and a new source of flicker and it is as bad as the traditional PWM from 240 to 2400Hz. I had to return my g200 and keep using G100

Have you tried the poco x4 gt? Or based on specs what do you think of it?
Posted by Mauro
 - May 04, 2022, 23:59:36
Thank You. I'm an happy user of the Motorola G100, and I was considering to upgrade to G200 because it's the only IPS flagship... Now I can skip it without hesitation.. Damn PWM, no phone change this year...

Quote from: anon999999 on February 22, 2022, 01:45:10
Would it be possible to stop saying that the lack of PWM or high PWM frequency is not a problem? My g100 does not produce any eye strain with brightness over 65 %, but this G200 causes instant severe eye strain at any brightness levels.

At the forums there are many like me. It seems that they introduced FRC or dithering and a new source of flicker and it is as bad as the traditional PWM from 240 to 2400Hz. I had to return my g200 and keep using G100
Posted by Ldr
 - April 24, 2022, 01:18:00
No
Posted by anon999999
 - February 22, 2022, 01:45:10
Would it be possible to stop saying that the lack of PWM or high PWM frequency is not a problem? My g100 does not produce any eye strain with brightness over 65 %, but this G200 causes instant severe eye strain at any brightness levels.

At the forums there are many like me. It seems that they introduced FRC or dithering and a new source of flicker and it is as bad as the traditional PWM from 240 to 2400Hz. I had to return my g200 and keep using G100
Posted by Redaktion
 - February 16, 2022, 03:27:09
On paper, the Moto G200 5G looks quite promising. On top of a fast 144-Hz panel, UFS 3.1 storage, LPDDR5 RAM and a flagship SoC, the Moto G200 has a built-in 108-MP triple cam and is powered by a 5,000 mAh battery. But once again there is an area, in which Motorola is lacking...

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Moto-G200-5G-in-review-5G-smartphone-offers-144-Hz-and-a-Snapdragon-888-at-a-fair-price.599742.0.html