If folks dont care about mobility, why buy mobile?

Since AMD's cheap and super efficient included graphics are ~40% better than their already very good Renoir graphics, only corner cases will want the H models w/ power hog discrete GPUs anyway.

For mainstream mobile, Intel is doomed.

The gaming performance was also mentioned in that article. It performs similar to laptops with a 3080 and 3070 card while having a 3060 card.

How much you are paid for this clickbait article? Seriously noone believe intel have a chance to outperform amd. (unless manipulated benchmarks...)

And what happens if those performance metrics are at 45 W for the 6800H versus 115+ W for the 12700H like the 12900HK? Again, Anandtech shows that when running at 30-35 W the Alder Lake 12900HK in the 17" MSI Raider has a <6% advantage compared to Notebookcheck's average score for Cezanne 5800Us in 13" laptops. So until you know power consumption for the tests, it's pretty meaningless because so far all Intel has shown is that when Alder Lake consumes way more power than most desktop CPUs, it is faster than AMD's notebook chips.

Those numbers are disappointing. I wonder if they are not capped in some way.