News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Tetsuro
 - January 30, 2022, 10:42:16
It's like a 1660, very good for 199$. Point is that today people are used to consider 200 watt cards and make stupid comparisons. It's a good 1080p solution, like the Xbox Series S.
Posted by JS
 - January 24, 2022, 15:13:26
The GPU WAS designed for laptops.  Techtube / techtwitter has been saying so for quite some time. 

Posted by Maj
 - January 24, 2022, 09:51:29
They should have lowered the price or called it lite. 6GB VRAM would have been better budget card.
Posted by Dink
 - January 24, 2022, 05:14:25
I agree that the labelling could have been better but my take is it is not the strongest card, and it's not meant to be. Currently for $199 you can't even buy a 1050ti (Microcenter has had some new ones on stock lately).  Since it's an upgrade from the 1050ti, I say, it's a good deal IF IT FITS YOUR USE REQUIREMENT. 

If it doesn't fit your use requirement, save up 3x the amount.
Posted by Cheeks2184
 - January 23, 2022, 16:21:19
I feel like they should've made it the 6500 non XT to make the lack of performance more clear. Also, it's not "nearly impossible" to get at MSRP. I've already had several opportunities to buy one for $199 but I'm not interested.
Posted by Anonymousgg
 - January 23, 2022, 14:03:43
It's obviously true, explaining several of the design decisions. Except putting 4 GB VRAM which is desktop specific and foils mining.

Quote from: LL on January 22, 2022, 19:59:14
I don't get it, why would anyone want it over an APU?

Because it's faster than the fastest Rembrandt and mobile Xe?
Posted by Sadnehs
 - January 23, 2022, 12:33:14
if they just called it the 6500 Lite,  or NB fore notebook, or something. I think peoples criticisms would be less harsh. Because they'd recognize its just a placeholder laptop gpu, being made available on desktop to help with shortages.

But they positioned it as the upgrade to the 5500 and priced it too high. Presumably they didnt want people to know they were doing a big portable push, but its stil very lame and deceptive of them.
Posted by CmdrEvil
 - January 23, 2022, 00:15:24
Not sure about other markets, but in UK it's in stock from most retailers for about 220-230 pounds
Posted by LL
 - January 22, 2022, 19:59:14
I don't get it, why would anyone want it over an APU?
Posted by Ilnahro
 - January 22, 2022, 19:52:43
In what world is the 6500XT going for 3x to 4x the MSRP? You can get a 6600 XT for 3x the MSRP of the 6500XT and a 6700XT for 4x the MSRP of the 6500XT. It is going for 1.5-2x the MSRP. Still a lot but nowhere near the exaggeration you suggest here.
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 22, 2022, 17:15:16
By popular consensus, the Radeon RX 6500 XT is a mediocre GPU with gaming performance on par with the last-gen Radeon RX 5500 XT 4 GB. A member of AMD's technical staff has now tried to explain the situation by positing that the Navi 24 chip featured inside the RX 6500 XT was initially meant to power discrete notebook GPUs.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-s-technical-staff-member-tries-to-explain-Radeon-RX-6500-XT-s-poor-performance-by-claiming-that-the-GPU-was-designed-for-laptops.594129.0.html