News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by tatakai
 - October 16, 2021, 05:25:39
Nobody showed userbenchmarks tests to be bad. They disagreed with their editorial decisions (how they weighted results to come to conclusions). Individual tests should be fine
Posted by Badger
 - October 02, 2021, 02:58:23
It's worth noting that the benchmarks themselves on UBM are extremely accurate. It's the "effective speed" titbits and the CPU descriptions favouring Intel that people get frustrated about.
Posted by Suckertechpress
 - September 30, 2021, 04:20:52
We're going to repeatedly acknowledge how trash and disrespected UBM's algorithm is, but that's not going to stop us churning out an article anyway

More free marketing for Intel that didn't cost them a cent. They are clever
Posted by EANigErxL
 - September 29, 2021, 14:35:54
UserBenchmark IS RUBBISH, RUBBISH ARTICLE.
Posted by lol
 - September 29, 2021, 14:15:39
UserBenchmark - that's all I need to read to know it's a big load of bullshit
Posted by Redaktion
 - September 29, 2021, 12:51:13
An Intel Core i9-12900 Alder Lake chip has been spotted being tested on an Asus ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme motherboard. The upcoming 16-core, 24-thread processor somehow managed to obliterate performance records on UserBenchmark, easily surpassing the average bench and 1-core scores of the Intel Core i9-11900K.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i9-12900-somehow-breaks-UserBenchmark-records-on-Asus-ROG-Maximus-Z690-Extreme-board-despite-a-4-25-GHz-boost-and-massive-CPU-throttling.567343.0.html