Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: !QAZXSW23EDC
« on: May 13, 2021, 11:27:50 »

Seriously?
We now benchmarking non released officially CPU's on lame a** games? ;)
Can't wait on results in PUBG or Valorian, or other trash.
Posted by: TechTree101
« on: May 12, 2021, 15:07:12 »

We need CPU bound games. DOTA 2 isn't CPU bound (or any hardware limited for that matter).

Don't pay attention to benchmarks that don't matter.
Posted by: xpclient
« on: May 11, 2021, 21:51:31 »

The way I understand, the platform i.e. Windows has to be updated for Alder Lake. Maybe whatever builds of Windows come with support for it - from 21H2 or 22H1, will be where it matters. As in the performance may be differently impacted?
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: May 11, 2021, 19:45:21 »

An Intel Alder Lake processor showed up on CapFrameX's database running DOTA2. On average, the game ran at 189 FPS, which is somewhat low, given that it isn't particularly resource-heavy. It could have happened due to DOTA2's inability to recognize Alder Lake's core configuration properly.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Alder-Lake-S-processor-fails-to-impress-in-DOTA2-benchmark.539143.0.html

 
C 2018 » Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska