News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Tymb
 - May 03, 2021, 21:36:40
Quote from: S.Yu on May 03, 2021, 01:30:46
I can't tell if this is sarcastic, the 360Hz screen is merely standard, apart from the high refresh rate, which some gamers do value, OLED OTOH is expensive, has PWM which might be a problem, and may not even guarantee good colors either, I remember a model from a few months ago having merely 80% ARGB and commented about how pathetic it was being an OLED. It will also likely be dimmer, and less efficient(panels of these sizes will not be anywhere near the efficiency of the best smartphone panels). Not to mention, the 15" Blades can be configured with OLED, 4K too, just throw money at it.
Nobody but Apple currently has a proper MiniLED implementation(enough backlight zones), and you don't know if it's true 10bit or 8+2 either.

Not sarcastic. 360Hz useless crap that is only needed by a very small group of useless humans. PWM isn't a problem really, stop crying. Less than 10% can see it. OLED doesn't guarantee perfect colors but they are much more vivid. That's enough. Everything else can be fixed with calibration. 10bit or 8+2 isn't really important. Still better than 6 or 8. And there's no problem making them real 10bit. Stop praising stupid apple. MiniLED is rare everywhere and it's sad.
Posted by RB15 User
 - May 03, 2021, 05:07:22
A little weird that you have the normal/balanced profile results in bold, but the higher values for all the benchmarks are in the 'Max'/Gaming mode and not in bold. People who don't look closely enough would probably just see the values in bold and think the Blade is drastically underperforming for the specs.
Posted by S.Yu
 - May 03, 2021, 01:30:46
Quote from: Tymb on May 02, 2021, 23:18:11
Old CPU is part of the problem but useless 360Hz screen with weak colors is a big one. No OLED or MiniLED with 10bit HDR in 2021 is simply pathetic.
I can't tell if this is sarcastic, the 360Hz screen is merely standard, apart from the high refresh rate, which some gamers do value, OLED OTOH is expensive, has PWM which might be a problem, and may not even guarantee good colors either, I remember a model from a few months ago having merely 80% ARGB and commented about how pathetic it was being an OLED. It will also likely be dimmer, and less efficient(panels of these sizes will not be anywhere near the efficiency of the best smartphone panels). Not to mention, the 15" Blades can be configured with OLED, 4K too, just throw money at it.
Nobody but Apple currently has a proper MiniLED implementation(enough backlight zones), and you don't know if it's true 10bit or 8+2 either.
Posted by Tymb
 - May 02, 2021, 23:18:11
Old CPU is part of the problem but useless 360Hz screen with weak colors is a big one. No OLED or MiniLED with 10bit HDR in 2021 is simply pathetic.
Posted by Henry Oswall
 - May 02, 2021, 20:27:40
> Processor: Intel Core i7-10875H

I'll pass
Posted by Marcanthonynoz
 - May 02, 2021, 18:02:55
Hey guys! Thanks for doing this review. I bought the same model but the 1440p variant. The only thing is I notice when gaming I'll get a micro stutter every couple seconds. Did you see this? Or did I just get a dud?
Posted by Redaktion
 - May 02, 2021, 02:13:33
The Blade 15 Advanced scores some major points with its powerful hardware and great battery life. What is more, the Blade 15 Advanced now features a second M.2-2280 slot.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Razer-Blade-15-Advanced-Early-2021-Review-Now-with-a-360-Hz-screen.536335.0.html