Definitely the dumbest article I've ever seen...I expected new integrated graphics vs old semi-discrete...instead we get an older lower tdp platform vs a newer higher tdp platform...are you stupid?

As was said, the headline is utter nonsense. Apples and oranges.

Quote from: Bubba on April 29, 2021, 08:31:32
That's just the heat bro ("100W"), they consume about the same.

:D Where does the heat come from? Have you heard of this crazy notion called conservation of energy?

Also here to point out that the 100W vs. 28W headline is bullshit and beneath you.

The actual results aren't surprising. The GPU is a generation newer on a better process, and the CPU is 3 gens newer on a more dense node. If they'd gone with a Navi 2 GPU it would outperform this one. 🤷‍♂️

Pretty retarded title to be fair. 100W includes both CPU and GPU for Hades Canyon.

Usual clickbait from NBC and their stupid editors.

The title is very misleading. I thought this was going to be comparing with just a Tiger Lake CPU, ie, just iGPU. If you factor the discrete RTX 2060, it's obviously not a 100W vs 28W comparison. It's more like 100W vs more than 100W comparison. The former is still going to be much slower running around the Vega GPU.

Thanks For Information Sharing When looking at the Radeon RX Vega M GH and mobile GeForce RTX 2060, the latter offers significantly faster frame rates especially when running demanding DX12 titles at higher resolutions where performance and techowiser.com becomes more GPU bound.

Thanks For Information Sharing When looking at the Radeon RX Vega M GH and mobile GeForce RTX 2060, the latter offers significantly faster frame rates especially when running demanding DX12 titles at higher resolutions where performance and Other Specifications becomes more GPU bound.

That's just the heat bro ("100W"), they consume about the same.