News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by _MT_
 - December 14, 2020, 23:07:31
Quote from: JayN on December 12, 2020, 18:55:28
What are the integrated GPU EU counts for these SKUs?
You can bet it's the small, 32 unit version (G1/ UHD, whatever you want to call it).
Posted by _MT_
 - December 14, 2020, 23:05:35
Quote from: epicbuilder2007 on December 12, 2020, 12:14:18
So basically, Intel's rocket lake i9-11900 is an i7-11700 with a higher clockspeed. Gee I wonder how much Intel's gonna mark up the price because of the Core i9 name.
It was like that with 9700, 9700K, 9900 and 9900K, wasn't it? Plus the HT was disabled, to differentiate the product more. The 900 was higher bin than 700 (more efficient, able to stay stable at higher frequencies). The K versions have higher power limits (allowing higher frequencies) and might be higher bins than respective non-K as well.
Posted by _MT_
 - December 14, 2020, 22:51:30
L3 cache is smaller because there are fewer cores. It still works out to 2 MiB per core (while it's shared, the total size depends on core count; as evidenced by the models with fewer cores).
Posted by Spunjji
 - December 14, 2020, 16:44:55
Quote from: Mehul Parashar on December 13, 2020, 20:09:08
All intel has to do is price them lower than their direct AMD counterparts... please don't mess this up Intel

This really is the key. Performance should be competitive with AMD's equivalent core count parts, albeit with dramatically worse power characteristics, so they really need to account for that (significant) deficit by dropping prices significantly.

This is Intel, though, so I expect we'll see them price them equivalently (at retail) and brute-force the OEM market as per usual. AMD simply can't supply enough products to actually lock Intel out of the market, so they'll more than likely get away with it, too.
Posted by Mehul Parashar
 - December 13, 2020, 20:09:08
All intel has to do is price them lower than their direct AMD counterparts... please don't mess this up Intel
Posted by Jaop
 - December 12, 2020, 23:36:13
Just call it Coreium already. Named after the nuclear reactor meltdown product corium. Crawled out of Chernobyl.
Posted by JayN
 - December 12, 2020, 18:55:28
There are recent SSDs and GPU cards tht can benefit from the higher bandwidth enabled by the 20 PCIE4 lanes.

What are the integrated GPU EU counts for these SKUs?
Posted by Mobster Joe
 - December 12, 2020, 15:26:19
Confirmed... this will be flop lake.
Posted by epicbuilder2007
 - December 12, 2020, 12:14:18
So basically, Intel's rocket lake i9-11900 is an i7-11700 with a higher clockspeed. Gee I wonder how much Intel's gonna mark up the price because of the Core i9 name.
Posted by Sakamoto
 - December 12, 2020, 11:40:30
Sorry for the double post.  To clarify, that only applies to gaming.  Productivity, AMD spanks Intel.  Badly.
Posted by Sakamoto
 - December 12, 2020, 11:31:21
If this holds up, it sounds like Intel may be able to match AMDs performance at a cheaper price point.  Assuming they're the same price as comet lake.  Problem will be efficiency, keeping it cool.
Posted by Wool
 - December 12, 2020, 11:00:21
Lava Lake.
Posted by RinzImpulse
 - December 12, 2020, 09:01:44
Stove lake
Posted by Jesse
 - December 12, 2020, 01:47:29
Meh.

It sounds like AMD will still be kicking intel's butt.
Posted by Cool
 - December 11, 2020, 23:56:30
Waiting for my furnace lake someday