News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by S.Yu
 - November 22, 2020, 18:09:36
Quote from: Alexandr on November 22, 2020, 10:46:58
Old "iron", you say?
And nothing that the laptop is already 1 year old?
At the expense of "expensive". - pass by, gentlemens! There is always something cheaper for you.

But these laptops have the best screen ever. It is a matte UHD with narrow bezels with excellent color reproduction and good brightness. It is truly a "mobile station". All other laptops with their glossy screens or matte low-brightness FHD are not suitable for full use in different areas.
Are you blind? It has mediocre brightness and only 85% ARGB! Any Dreamcolor workstation has a better screen than this crap! Matte is not nearly worth that much money.
Posted by Alexandr
 - November 22, 2020, 10:46:58
Old "iron", you say?
And nothing that the laptop is already 1 year old?
At the expense of "expensive". - pass by, gentlemens! There is always something cheaper for you.

But these laptops have the best screen ever. It is a matte UHD with narrow bezels with excellent color reproduction and good brightness. It is truly a "mobile station". All other laptops with their glossy screens or matte low-brightness FHD are not suitable for full use in different areas.
Posted by dhkd
 - November 15, 2020, 15:57:16
ASUS has lost its mind. They probably have a dillusional and grandeur view of themselves.
Posted by Philippe
 - November 15, 2020, 13:52:34
It's too expensive !!! They take their customers for idiots ;-(
Posted by Jesse
 - November 15, 2020, 01:46:15
... is too much money for a workstation THAT WEIGHS THIS MUCH.
Posted by S.Yu
 - November 15, 2020, 00:49:17
Sorely dated at this time, for this price.  They should slash 40% off.
Posted by Mikita
 - November 14, 2020, 19:01:03
Absence of TB is it's lesser problem.. Old Coffee Lake-R CPU, soldered RAM (in "workstation" machine!!), terrible thermals, and all that for $6k. I believe all cost went into overpriced Nvidia gpu. Most would prefer to see some Ryzen 4900H option which would simply destroy 9750, even at much lower temps/consumption.
Posted by vasra
 - November 14, 2020, 13:05:45
Old CPU, old GPU, high price. Very easy to take a pass.
Waiting for Zen3 based Ryzen 5800U laptops with RTX30x0 mobile series chips.
Posted by Redaktion
 - November 14, 2020, 03:40:52
The workstation from Asus scores some major points with its high level of performance, 4K screen and 16 GB of VRAM. Moreover, it also comes with 32 GB of RAM and a 1 TB NVMe SSD. However, there is no Thunderbolt 3 port.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-Asus-ProArt-StudioBook-Pro-15-5000-Euros-5908-is-too-much-money-for-a-workstation-without-a-Thunderbolt-3-port.503611.0.html