Well TSMC certainly rules chip making, but there is a lot of marketing hype in the 'nm' nomenclature. As marketeers are apt to do, that is 'stretch the definition'. At 20 nm and above everyone was basically using the same terminology, now many are stretching what the 'nm' rating means. You have to do really detailed research to find exactly how to compare various 'nm' claims. That said, TSMC is still leading the push lower no matter how they name it.

Wow. More performance, less power, smaller, based on well understood architecture. Doesn't look good for Intel, as each generation the gap will become wider and significantly more difficult to bridge. The best Intel can hope for here is to remain within 1 node of TSMC so consumers don't notice the gap, Intel 7nm verses AMD 5nm etc.