News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Freddell
 - October 02, 2020, 10:13:54
On the SPEC sheet it says 68Wh battery but on the youtube "Lenovo ThinkPad T15P Unboxing, Disassembly and Review" teardown you can clearly read 5655mAh on the battery. Can you clarify if this i your review?
Posted by Jeannique
 - September 04, 2020, 08:24:24
It would appear that this laptop is out on the market. When can we expect a review of the 6 cores and 8 cores models?
Posted by J_L
 - August 05, 2020, 09:19:36
Quote from: Benjamin Herzig on August 05, 2020, 00:00:07
Quote from: J_L on August 04, 2020, 23:54:18Surprisingly, there are still more hits for "1050" instead of 1650 via Ctrl+F. At least 1650 would be what I assume is the actual GPU...
Sorry about that - the spec sheet quite clearly names the GTX 1050, so that was just a typo. I guess my brain also could not comprehend at first why the GTX 1050 is used here ;D
No problem, I realized soon after my post but it was too late. It'd just be bizarre to use a 1050 at this point. And I just noticed "MX330" as well, but not on spec sheet. Either way, I must admit a Ryzen version would be more interesting for me as well.
Posted by Antonio Smith
 - August 05, 2020, 08:52:16
Honestly I feel like the smarter move here was ryzen because of better power efficiency and Better performance with the new 4000 series mobile chips
Posted by tinfever
 - August 05, 2020, 04:23:36
Lenovo, read my lips: No AMD, No sale
Posted by Benjamin Herzig
 - August 05, 2020, 00:00:07
Quote from: J_L on August 04, 2020, 23:54:18Surprisingly, there are still more hits for "1050" instead of 1650 via Ctrl+F. At least 1650 would be what I assume is the actual GPU...
Sorry about that - the spec sheet quite clearly names the GTX 1050, so that was just a typo. I guess my brain also could not comprehend at first why the GTX 1050 is used here ;D
Posted by J_L
 - August 04, 2020, 23:54:18
Surprisingly, there are still more hits for "1050" instead of 1650 via Ctrl+F. At least 1650 would be what I assume is the actual GPU...
Posted by marc
 - August 04, 2020, 19:57:56
I used to love and advocate thinkpad as the best notebook, i used t40, t41, x60, t61, x200, t430. At first, it felt robust, reliable and I only get thinkpad. However, my dissapointment started with t61, in which the built in and dedicated graphics failed on me and won't turn on at 3 years mark. Secondly, frustration grew on x200, with its integrated lan hardware failure. And to top it off, nightmare began with t430, my external monitor randomly loss signal (no signal) when connected to it, now it randomly turn on and off and flickers. There was no issue initially, happens after a while. Clean install didnt help, and i thought the problem with the monitor, but it is working fine with other computer.
Now, I have had enough with thinkpad, the quality is no longer there like the good old when it was under ibm.
Posted by marc
 - August 04, 2020, 19:56:41
I used to love and advocate thinkpad as the best notebook, i used t40, t41, x60, t61, x200, t430. At first, it felt robust, reliable and I only get thinkpad. However, my dissapointment started with t61, in which the built in and dedicated graphics failed on me and won't turn on at 3 years mark. Secondly, frustration grew on x200, with its integrated lan hardware failure. And to top it off, nightmare began with t430, my external monitor randomly loss signal (no signal) when connected to it, now it randomly turn on and off and flickers. There was no issue initially, happens after a while. Clean install didnt help, and i thought the problem with the monitor, but it is working fine with other computer.
Now, I have had enough with thinkpad, the quality is no longer there like the good old when it was under ibm.
Posted by jeremy
 - August 04, 2020, 18:36:44
The selection of specs seem so bad, that I am curious if this was a deliberate attempt to kill off a product concept?

Like the Retro 25, which launched with abhorrent specs (dual core!?) right as a new generation with quad cores was about to launch. I always got the feeling Lenovo did that deliberately, so they could easily justify the lack of any future 7 row thinkpads on "well, it didn't sell well because people didn't want it." Same with this. There is no other explanation for this sort of malarkey, outside of incompetency so extreme that it couldn't be justified.

My only other guess is the inevitable P series version of this is less silly? I doubt it, but that's my guess.
Posted by LHPSU
 - August 04, 2020, 16:55:14
Quote from: Anonym on August 04, 2020, 15:02:53
Impressive engineering just to be marginally faster than the much more efficient AMD CPUs that, somehow, are yet to be featured in one of the Thinkpad performance series.

Let me be clear, I am still typing this in an Intel based Thinkpad and proudly so, as this was the best available at that time. However, if Thinkpad is now just an Intel centric sub-brand instead of being those iconic machines that deliver the best enterprise-grade components available, I will be forced to start looking elsewhere.

A shame, really.
Good luck finding a major line of laptops that has more AMD models available than Thinkpads.
Posted by Daniel Ridenhour
 - August 04, 2020, 16:45:07
The 68wh battery may be a bit later... I would much prefer a 4800h or 4900hs in this than Intel... although that would nix the TB3 port most likely which screws up docking for the TP.     I'm still mourning the loss of powerbridge and removable batteries on the TP line and can't see myself buying one of the new ones though.   

Also a note for content creators...   for many while their mobile having more GPU memory is more important that performance.   I would much rather have a mx350 with 4gb of RAM than a 1650 with 3gb.   I don't know why HP is the only vender who ever seems to field 4gb mx series nvidia cards but mobile renderers appreciate it.    Although I wish their machines where such a bear to get into.
Posted by klahjs
 - August 04, 2020, 16:41:19
It doesn't look good for me at all. It is like Lenovo was greedy and saved money on latest MX350 and pushing that 3 y/o 1050 legacy abomination.
Does this configuration at least have proper dual-fan cooling solution?
Posted by Anonym
 - August 04, 2020, 15:02:53
Impressive engineering just to be marginally faster than the much more efficient AMD CPUs that, somehow, are yet to be featured in one of the Thinkpad performance series.

Let me be clear, I am still typing this in an Intel based Thinkpad and proudly so, as this was the best available at that time. However, if Thinkpad is now just an Intel centric sub-brand instead of being those iconic machines that deliver the best enterprise-grade components available, I will be forced to start looking elsewhere.

A shame, really.
Posted by 46615161efef
 - August 04, 2020, 13:35:49
Such a cute radiator  ;D