News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by dasdasdas
 - July 16, 2020, 08:53:45
Quote from: Nemo7 on July 14, 2020, 22:28:49
Quote from: ijfsdjols on July 14, 2020, 13:51:11
You are funny. 0.7V is the idle voltage, not in a million years you'll see 4.5Ghz full load with 0.7V. As for scores, given that zen 2 has ~5-10% higher IPC than Skylake and 5.3Ghz of the 10900K is 14% higher frequency than 4.64Ghz of the 4700G and 4700G is 7% behind in score, this means Zen 2 implementation in 4700G has ~7% higher IPC compared to Ice Lake, as expected.

Ice Lake has a much higher IPC than Zen2.
You can check AT review on this topic. Ice Lake is on average about 10% better IPC than Zen 2.
Posted by _MT_
 - July 15, 2020, 12:16:23
I doubt it maintained 65 W envelope while overclocked. ASRock is known for fudging power numbers (feeding lies to the processor to trick it into drawing more). I imagine it wasn't running on a public, production BIOS. In general, you really have to be careful when performance testing processors as motherboards can pull all sorts of dirty tricks that screw the results.
Posted by rs
 - July 15, 2020, 09:31:14
Quote from: Nemo7 on July 14, 2020, 22:28:49
Ice Lake has a much higher IPC than Zen2.
Depends. According to specint/fp Ice Lake has less than 10% more IPC compared to Ryzen 3000 desktop on average. But Renoir has much lower DRAM latencies. So, especially desktop Renoir could have a some IPC advantages over Ryzen 3000 desktop. Which decreases the IPC gap to Ice Lake.
Posted by Nemo7
 - July 14, 2020, 22:28:49
Quote from: ijfsdjols on July 14, 2020, 13:51:11
You are funny. 0.7V is the idle voltage, not in a million years you'll see 4.5Ghz full load with 0.7V. As for scores, given that zen 2 has ~5-10% higher IPC than Skylake and 5.3Ghz of the 10900K is 14% higher frequency than 4.64Ghz of the 4700G and 4700G is 7% behind in score, this means Zen 2 implementation in 4700G has ~7% higher IPC compared to Ice Lake, as expected.

Ice Lake has a much higher IPC than Zen2.
Posted by ijfsdjols
 - July 14, 2020, 13:51:11
You are funny. 0.7V is the idle voltage, not in a million years you'll see 4.5Ghz full load with 0.7V. As for scores, given that zen 2 has ~5-10% higher IPC than Skylake and 5.3Ghz of the 10900K is 14% higher frequency than 4.64Ghz of the 4700G and 4700G is 7% behind in score, this means Zen 2 implementation in 4700G has ~7% higher IPC compared to Ice Lake, as expected.
Posted by Redaktion
 - July 14, 2020, 13:20:10
Initial benchmarks for the Ryzen 7 4700G are here, AMD's upcoming 65 W Renoir desktop APU. The Ryzen 7 4700G has been shown to offer upwards of 25% more performance than the Ryzen 7 4800H while being competitive against the likes of the Intel Core i9-10900K.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-AMD-Ryzen-7-4700G-holds-its-own-against-the-Intel-Core-i9-10900K-in-initial-benchmarks.481216.0.html