Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: S.Yu
« on: April 15, 2020, 15:01:36 »

Interesting, but Samsung's 5nm is definitely worse than TSMC's, perhaps barely edging out N7+.
Posted by: opelit
« on: April 15, 2020, 13:25:13 »

So this is where Exynos with rDNA2 comes first? Sign me in. If it will not be overpriced as the 649$ for S**t i3 then I am rly interested in these laptops.
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: April 15, 2020, 11:06:35 »

Rumour has it that Google has already received working versions of its custom Exynos SoC, developed in partnership with Samsung. Codenamed Whitechapel, the 8-core ARM chip is said to be based on a 5 nm process. While there has been talk of the 5 nm chip making its way into the Pixel 5, Google may have even bigger plans for Whitechapel.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Whitechapel-Google-s-custom-5-nm-Exynos-SoC-may-be-coming-to-Pixels-and-Chromebooks-but-not-the-Pixel-5.461592.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska