News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Rick Patruno
 - May 28, 2020, 16:33:22
This article is horse sh*t. It is so far away from any real truth. Just check out this geekbench result and compare it to the so called ice-lake results:

browser . geekbench . com /v4/cpu/14236174

If you can't open the link, let me tell you the results:
EPYC 7452, 1 processor, 32 cores, single core score: 4463, multi-core score: 43845

Intel ice lake 2 processors, 32 cores, single core score: 4507, multi-core score: 41522

yeah, right... intel is almost catching up.. :) but wait.. milan is coming and there are still no leaks for milan performance...
Posted by DesignsID
 - March 13, 2020, 09:17:41
Absolute Intel fan posting this article.

Google EPYC 7702P Geekbench and you get results well over 100K points.

Face facts EPYC 7702P is 200w single socket monster that Intel cannot compete with at all. Not In terms of performance, cost, core count or power consumption.

Intel need to be completely reinventive in the server market because right now AMD is crushing any competition
Posted by bobeer86
 - March 12, 2020, 13:33:47
Horrible article full of misinformation; I expected better from notebookcheck.

7702P - just like all P-series Epycs - is a single socket only part. The reason why it shows as dual socket is due to how current versions of Windows Server handle systems with more than 64 threads - each 64 threads get bundled into a Numa node and virtual socket. It only affects 48 and 64 core parts with SMT enabled.

You might want to do some proper research next time before posting click bait articles like this.
Posted by Anon
 - March 12, 2020, 13:17:30
What a clickbait.

The results from Geekbench are fluctuacting for 7702P, ranging from 10k all the way up to whopping 150k points.

And they're all from Geekbench v4 (go search for the results by yourself).
Posted by william blake
 - March 12, 2020, 12:24:36
Quote from: Vaidyanathan on March 12, 2020, 12:14:42
Milan will be interesting even though it will top-out at 64 cores like Rome
same node, new arch?
-desktops
-laptops
-hedt and servers are last in my personal list of interest
Posted by Vaidyanathan
 - March 12, 2020, 12:14:42
Quote from: william blake on March 12, 2020, 09:17:42
i will wait till ~100k geekbench 4 from intel.
amd is so far ahead its not even funny. 2019 chips are faster and more efficient than 2021 chips from competitor.

Milan will be interesting even though it will top-out at 64 cores like Rome
Posted by william blake
 - March 12, 2020, 09:17:42
i will wait till ~100k geekbench 4 from intel.
amd is so far ahead its not even funny. 2019 chips are faster and more efficient than 2021 chips from competitor.
Posted by Redaktion
 - March 12, 2020, 08:05:59
Geekbench listings of what appears to be a 32-core (16-core dual-socket) Intel Ice Lake Server processor have surfaced. Ice Lake Server appears to put up a strong show against AMD's Epyc Rome 7702P in Geekbench 4 running on Windows Server 2019 with half the number of cores. AMD, however, has the core-count advantage, which still eludes Intel owing to lower yields on the 10nm process.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/32-core-2x-16-Intel-Ice-Lake-Server-Geekbench-benchmarks-leak-80-more-performance-than-AMD-Epyc-Rome-7702P-with-half-the-cores.456780.0.html