News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Andrekua
 - February 01, 2020, 04:36:46
Personally I really hope that high end SoC would get rid of those A57 low power chip or at least reduced their numbers. Why do we need 4x A57 cores anyway?

Seriously, if they are going for tri-core design, then they should consider using /2x A57 for idle operation, 3 mid performance cores with 3 high performance cores (for gaming or high load).
Posted by Bilawal
 - February 01, 2020, 01:45:29
My S10+ exynos scored 826 in SC and 2224 in MC
Posted by Bilawal
 - February 01, 2020, 00:17:16
That's what I was afraid of.. inferior SoC for Global market. I don't think GPU and efficiency will be better than SD865 too.
Posted by Ricci Rox
 - January 31, 2020, 11:39:21
Quote from: S.Yu on January 31, 2020, 11:27:02
What's there to bridge? Exynos uses stock ARM cores now.
The disadvantage in multicore may point to memory management or cache issues.


Exynos 990 uses Mongoose cores.
Posted by S.Yu
 - January 31, 2020, 11:27:02
What's there to bridge? Exynos uses stock ARM cores now.
The disadvantage in multicore may point to memory management or cache issues.
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 31, 2020, 06:53:04
The Exynos 990 variant of the Samsung Galaxy S20 has now been tested on Geekbench 5.1. The big question, of course, is how it compares to the Snapdragon 865 models. Well, your guess is probably the case.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Exynos-990-Galaxy-S20-surfaces-on-Geekbench-How-does-it-compare-to-the-Snapdragon-865-model.452710.0.html