News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Sds
 - November 04, 2019, 08:19:15
Horrible add. Comparing two cards from total power range. Please compare at a same power with nvidia will see how it sucks
Posted by Aoife
 - November 03, 2019, 18:07:13
5500M is a power hog. Terrible efficiency even with a huge 7nm process advantage.

Apples to apples total power:

1660 Ti Max-Q - 60W
5500M - 100W (85W claimed by AMD plus the ~15% regulator loss they like to forget)

And 1660 Ti is still faster.

Nothing to see here
Posted by Kian
 - November 03, 2019, 12:08:23
Same performance as the GTX 1660 Ti but at what power consumption?
Posted by Redaktion
 - November 01, 2019, 10:20:45
We were able to run numerous gaming benchmarks on the AMD Radeon RX 5500M as part of our exclusive hands-on with the MSI Alpha 15, an outline of which we shall provide in this review snippet. In short, the new Navi 14 chip comes closer to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q than the GTX 1650, while even reaching GTX 1660 Ti levels on occasion.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Comeback-AMD-reaches-NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-Max-Q-levels-of-performance-with-the-Radeon-RX-5500M.440495.0.html