News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Ronny33x
 - October 17, 2019, 19:48:41
Xiaomi always does this. For example Mi Max was more powerful then Mi Max 2 and 3.. They put a phone in the market that is a real good deal and where they barely earn money on.. Then the successor they put in a cheap a** SOC and hope nobody will notice. And cash in..
Posted by Ricci Rox
 - October 17, 2019, 17:01:06
Quote from: fdsofldmos on October 17, 2019, 16:11:01
Dude, snapdragon 632 is eight core A53 at 1.8 Ghz and snapdragon 439 is eight core a53 at 2 Ghz. How exactly is the snapdragon 439 slower in your view? Except the slower gpu, I see no cons.

We've run plenty of tests on both SoCs and the Snapdragon 632 typically has a ~40% single-core advantage over the Snapdragon 438.
Posted by fdsofldmos
 - October 17, 2019, 16:11:01
Dude, snapdragon 632 is eight core A53 at 1.8 Ghz and snapdragon 439 is eight core a53 at 2 Ghz. How exactly is the snapdragon 439 slower in your view? Except the slower gpu, I see no cons.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 16, 2019, 15:57:08
Xiaomi fans may have felt confused when the Redmi 8's spec sheet was released, as the device features a Snapdragon 439—the same SoC on the cheaper Redmi 8A, and a much weaker chipset than the Snapdragon 632 on the Redmi 7. Xiaomi had a reason for it, and it's not a completely unreasonable one, either.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/This-is-why-Xiaomi-opted-for-the-weak-Snapdragon-439-on-the-Redmi-8.439232.0.html