News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Targonis
 - August 18, 2019, 09:51:21
What most people keep missing is that Ryzen performance varies greatly based on the RAM used.   Do you benchmark with DDR4-3200CL16, 3200CL14, 3600CL16, or what?   Different reviews, even by the same web site don't have a consistent set of RAM used, and it isn't displayed clearly with the benchmark without digging.   

The benchmarks where Ryzen 3rd generation is closer to the performance of the 9900k in single threaded are run with DDR4-3600 RAM, and 3200 RAM gives a bigger lead to the 9900k.   There haven't been nearly enough comparisons to show this, and newbies who don't know are being mislead, or at least, they are not being told that you can get much better performance from Ryzen with better RAM.   Now, if we could get 2x8GB DDR4-3600CL14 RAM for $200, people wouldn't be buying nearly as many Intel chips.
Posted by Redaktion
 - August 15, 2019, 00:42:19
The Ryzen Zen 2 series may currently be the order of the day, but AMD has something even bigger around the corner. What may prove to be the upper-tier of the next-generation Threadripper series has reared its head on Geekbench in two listings to deliver multi-core scores that are nigh on unbelievable, obliterating

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-Zen-2-scores-over-2x-the-Ryzen-9-3900X-in-Geekbench-more-than-2-5x-times-higher-than-the-Threadripper-2950X-and-Core-i9-9900K-too.430337.0.html