In the PWM picture, there are 1428 Hz and 60 Hz. Shouldn't we say that the PWM frequency is the lower one?

Don't mind with the lack of Google but the SoC kills this excellent tablet. If it's been priced modestly, then it's perfect but this is a flagship grade pricing sporting a mid-class chipset.

We know you cannot stand much things NikoB, the problem is that you want to enforce your views in others...

Anyway tablets are a very confortable devices for me, have a comparatively weak one but  it has been very good for a fast use, travel and when i need a screen bigger than the smartphone. Hotspot from the phone to the tablet and i can fill forms in many sites i need to while traveling.

I fundamentally hate and cannot stand AMOLED screens. I have never in my life seen AMOLED on smartphones and tablets without flickering at low brightness levels, and these are exactly the working brightness levels of all streets.

Well, secondly, I can't stand tablets. And not only that, just like smartphones, these are extremely dangerous devices (especially for children) - they are held tightly to the tissues of the body, and there have already been plenty of scandals with violations of SAR tests.

I prefer laptops - it is at least 30-40cm from the body tissues along the radiating antennas of wi-fi/cellular networks, i.e. it is hundreds of times safer, especially for children.

add some cash and get tab s9 series, if you are into android

I see that there is a theme of obvious fake data on the PWM frequency, inflated by several times from the real ones, which has never happened before on AMOLED matrices even close. And because At the same time, the author does not perform hardware calibration and does NOT check the native contrast. On AMOLED matrices this automatically leads to extremely sad consequences.

I doubt the validity of the data in this review.

Nah for that price it lacks too many features. Might as well pick a samsung tablet for that kind of money.