Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Antworten

Name:
E-Mail:
Betreff:
Symbol:

Verifizierung:

Shortcuts: mit Alt+S Beitrag schreiben oder Alt+P für Vorschau


Zusammenfassung

Autor: Ish
« am: September 14, 2021, 22:11:46 »

So no  changes since the last list?
Autor: Grinnie Jax
« am: Januar 12, 2021, 05:09:16 »

Best multimedia laptop with 50 dB at load and with 50 °C on the keyboard?
Autor: passenger
« am: Juni 13, 2020, 07:47:42 »

sorry for the typo: it's s540, not s340
Autor: passenger
« am: Juni 13, 2020, 07:43:59 »

(as of 2020 June 13)

I don't quite understand this ranking.

NBC had reviewed the 2020 macbook pro 16", yet they put the old butterfly switch 15" on the first place, whereas the 16" isn't even in the list?

And why are the lenovo ideapad s340 and msi ps63 modern even on the list in the first place?
Their screen and performance are just mediocre at best, and as for the ps63, you call a laptop with less than 200nits of brightness a "multimedia" laptop? Seriously?
Autor: ros
« am: November 19, 2019, 22:16:01 »

It isn't really fair, you are evaluating v6 and v7 reviewed products with the same scale
Autor: Sonia
« am: Juli 11, 2018, 13:22:21 »

All given best multimedia notebook, any of one you can have for your official purposes and all notebook are perfect for work and also have smart features.

       
  • Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)Razer Blade (2017)
            HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
       Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
       Gigabyte Aero 15
       Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
       Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
       Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
       Dell Inspiron 17-7773-0043
       Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL

Thanks & Regards

Sonia
Autor: BryGuy91
« am: Mai 13, 2018, 21:30:05 »

I agree with some ratings for the May 2018 update. The Aero 15 is very nice as are the new HP laptops,ASUS etc. I still don't get how the XPS 15 is missed, or why you have the macbook ranked as number 1? Most everyone can agree the macbooks have not been refreshed in quite some time and the hardware specs are far behind some of these other offerings. Also, screen brightness does not dictate accuracy. The XPS infinity edge screen and probably some of HP's have the most accurate RGB color specs.
Autor: Lord K
« am: April 09, 2016, 10:55:29 »

May I ask why the i7 FHD model of the XPS 15 9550 (http://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-XPS-15-9550-Core-i7-FHD-Notebook-Review.158875.0.html) is not listed, despite having a higher score than the i7 UHD version (i7 FHD: 88%; i7 UHD: 86%)?
Autor: OsCeZrCd
« am: Januar 13, 2016, 21:00:09 »

Can someone fix the amazon.com links? Many of them are horribly wrong, pointing to similar models with outdated processors.
Autor: Sam86592
« am: Juni 21, 2015, 22:19:50 »

I don't really understand what is ASUS doing... In my opinion the N550JK is better in every aspect compared to the N551JK
Autor: gary
« am: April 19, 2015, 11:17:07 »

Please consider giving readers an alternative method for rating devices that doesn't revolve around your interpretation of what a multimedia, business, lightweight gaming device should be. JUST GIVE US THE FACTS and let us filter what criteria we think is important.

 I really appreciate the detail of your technical evaluations but not your interpretation of them. 

How could you seriously recommend by rating an old notebook with ancient gpu at the top of your list when because of its age a new model is likely soon.

Further, you only encourage manufacturers it rest on their laurels
Autor: gary
« am: April 19, 2015, 10:51:51 »

Seriously , your two top notebooks for "multimedia" have old GT750 GPU's...  I would have thought the graphics performance would be the key criteria in judging a multimedia notebook...
Autor: Maciek
« am: Januar 30, 2015, 21:04:15 »

"[v5-573g] could be even considered a gaming notebook, but it only costs 799 Euros" - so now the price makes a notebook gaming or not?
Autor: gary
« am: Januar 16, 2015, 13:41:50 »

Aghhhhhhhhhh, wtf is this wortman at 80, even the 18 month old gigabyte p34g gets 82, but of course its an old notebook and your criteria excludes older notebooks.... sic Macbook Pro retina, sorry your ratings have no credibility
Autor: dpschramm
« am: Dezember 08, 2014, 08:05:48 »

I'm also surprised the XPS 15 (early 2014) isn't here, when it was 2nd behind the MBPr15 until recently, and is one of the main machines compared against in the Zenbook NX500 review. As other commenters have noted, its difficult to rely on these lists when there are such glaring ommisions. More transparency would be appreciated.

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska