News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Michael Holmes
 - May 17, 2020, 05:19:27
I'm currently looking to buy two new, gaming capable laptops for my wife and myself. I was looking at some Intel based models as well as AMD, but was a little frustrated with the available AMD choices. Today I've been watching YouTube video reviews and read this article, and you know what, screw Intel. I refuse to buy a laptop with an Intel CPU inside now. I'll make my dissatisfaction known with my wallet.
Posted by stephen rhodes
 - April 22, 2020, 23:17:29
Michael Dell, for example, paid a personal fine for just this sort of business with Intel:

In July 2010 Dell Inc. agreed to pay a $100 million penalty to settle SEC charges[29] of disclosure and accounting fraud in relation to undisclosed payments from Intel Corporation. Michael Dell and former CEO Kevin Rollins agreed to pay $4 million each and former CFO James Schneider agreed to pay $3 million to settle the charges.[29]--wikipedia
Posted by Antonio P Marchesi
 - April 21, 2020, 18:11:17
The whole Justice system is to blame for this, worldwide... If you do something wrong you get punished big time, if you steal, coherse, cheat Billions you only get penalized by a small % of that amount, so... you actually made profit... in another words... Big Corporations benefit from wrong doing, there is no real penalty from doing so, actually I will go as far as calling it a good business decision, you get a slap in the wrist that you are allowed to appeal, and you can keep your profits.
Posted by k
 - April 16, 2020, 08:51:04
blame is possible. but one should not forget even intel itself is not big player there, infact it is very little businessmen for intel in embedded or similar solutions. Moreover, TSMC capacity is limited and glo-fo variants are not power efficient. so may be latter when TSMC rises to 5nm and samsung comes out with next node, current 7nm processor may see path to that arena. Right now AMD itself may not be interested in low margin business, which is open meagerly to x86-64 platform.
Posted by TheOverLord
 - April 16, 2020, 04:27:33
Typical Intel. If you can't win fair and square... Cheat.
Posted by Moman
 - April 15, 2020, 16:46:33
Just refreshed an old phenom ii build I had with an fx 6300 for media pc . Runs beautiful! I will be building a new gaming / desktop and won't consider Intel for this crap they do! Anti- American! Pure scum
Posted by kiwi00
 - April 15, 2020, 14:32:17
I imagine this is because Intel is fearing how much sells could AMD have with Ryzen APUs. Really good graphics performance with low consumption will make an excellent mini PC for casual gaming at a nice price. Sh*tty movements from Intel.
Posted by Anastasios Fotiadis
 - April 15, 2020, 13:30:51
Being there, done that. Same old Intel as back in 2004 when Athlon X2 offerings were beating their a@@@s big time.
They were giving incentives to manufacturers in money or extra CPUs in order to not build or sell pc's with AMD CPUs.
Lets show some love to AMD for once and punish Intel?
Posted by Intel Sauce
 - April 15, 2020, 13:02:28
I will take note of which manufacturers are slow to offer AMD computers. Then, I will pay them less attention. Will buy AMD for next laptop and desktop.
Posted by Ragni
 - April 15, 2020, 09:52:46
Asus is selling the Asus ROG Zephyrus G .  This gaming notebook uses a ryzen 3k
Posted by Junglist724
 - April 15, 2020, 02:26:27
HP and Lenovo already made mini pcs with GE variants of ryzen apus.
Posted by Steve Ballmer
 - April 14, 2020, 23:19:39
Intel never learns and it appears neither do PC manufacturers. There is now a huge opportunity for smaller PC suppliers to beat the big guys. It may also lead to a lot more people building their own. I certainly hope so. The only obstacle at the moment is the difficulty in obtaining delivery of some parts, especially SFF cases.
Posted by niccco
 - April 14, 2020, 18:25:46
intel has a history of doing anti-competitive practices, so this isn't very surprising...screw intel.
Posted by invincible
 - April 14, 2020, 17:43:36
very good thing coming out of Intel never changing and they attempt to try this bad act again? you think the world is stupid ? boycott Intel product!
Posted by william blake
 - April 14, 2020, 17:24:27
in case you guys are not familiar with the recent a-tech renoir review
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15708/amds-mobile-revival-redefining-the-notebook-business-with-the-ryzen-9-4900hs-a-review
good read with some interesting points like 2666 vs 3200 memory and productivity on the battery.