Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Muhammad Anhar

- February 09, 2020, 08:25:05

Compare it to base model Surface Pro 7 and you could tell more.

Posted by adam.mt

- February 03, 2020, 22:44:52

Rather illustrates that your review scoring is flawed, doesn't it?

You (rightfully) don't recommend (the 13" Pro is a far better buy), yet you award 88% for the 2018 and 85% for the 2019 models!

Posted by Johnson

- February 03, 2020, 22:29:24

I was disappointed when Apple redesigned the MacBook Air.
Sure, the new fanless low power chips perform a little better in benchmarks, thanks to Intel moving to a new process node, but they could have just slimmed the old MacBook Air down a little, keeping the overall shape, with a major upgrade to the CPU and GPU and larger screen with minimal bezels. I'm not a fan of the wedge look either. The old tear drop shape was very nice and minimalist.

Posted by john smith

- February 03, 2020, 21:11:19

WOw...this is last years news...nothing new to right about?

Posted by Redaktion

- February 03, 2020, 14:52:56

The MacBook Air is a well-known brand, so it makes sense for Apple to offer corresponding devices. However, both the performance and connectivity fall behind the competition, and Apple's own MacBook Pro 13 is a better alternative.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-MacBook-Air-appears-pretty-outdated.452754.0.html