News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by S.Yu
 - February 27, 2019, 13:11:10
Quote from: Yuri on February 26, 2019, 06:59:11
I don't understand why laptop makers resist using external graphics enclosures so much. Not having a powerful graphics inside would make this so much easier to cool! Cooler laptop is quieter and needs a smaller power brick, making it more portable. And it isn't just razer, every laptop maker seems to do the same thing. No support for external enclosures or ridiculously handicapped support at a very high price, like 10 times more than the cost of a PC case with a psu.
Is it handicapped or is full performance simply not possible with the current interface?
Posted by Yuri
 - February 26, 2019, 06:59:11
I don't understand why laptop makers resist using external graphics enclosures so much. Not having a powerful graphics inside would make this so much easier to cool! Cooler laptop is quieter and needs a smaller power brick, making it more portable. And it isn't just razer, every laptop maker seems to do the same thing. No support for external enclosures or ridiculously handicapped support at a very high price, like 10 times more than the cost of a PC case with a psu.
Posted by Sodalitas
 - February 11, 2019, 15:54:52
I wonder if the difference stems from a different 2070 Max-Q SKU. 90W vs 80W maybe??
Posted by sticky
 - February 11, 2019, 14:37:29
It was the case with GTX 10 series Max-Q as well, just that the performance discrepancy among higher cards was not as variable as the GTX 20 series.
Posted by S.Yu
 - February 11, 2019, 08:46:03
Nice, this should mean that the 2080 Max Q is also less underclocked bringing it closer to the desktop version.
Posted by Redaktion
 - February 11, 2019, 04:15:02
The GPU in the Razer laptop has a 22 percent faster base clock rate than the same GPU on the Gigabyte Aero 15 X9. The result? Consistently faster gaming performance on the Razer Blade 15 by 10 to 15 percent.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Not-created-equal-Razer-Blade-15-RTX-2070-Max-Q-is-10-to-15-percent-faster-than-the-Gigabyte-Aero-15-X9.406211.0.html