News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by thafluu
 - Today at 01:13:37
Quote from: liar liar on Today at 00:04:59it absolutely does not have "better gpu performance". that is a blatant lie.
It absolutely does. Only the X CPUs and the 338H from Panther lake have the strong iGPU (Arc B370/B390). All other Panther Lake chips, like the tested 325 or even an 356H, have weaker iGPU than Panther Lake. Fitting account name btw :)

Very happy I ordered a 32GB Lunar Lake T14 which are on sale rn.
Posted by liar liar
 - Today at 00:04:59
Quote from: Kiphanes Trophome on Yesterday at 22:11:21Lunar Lake seems simply better than Panther Lake U.
Similar CPU performance. Better GPU performance. Better battery life. And cheaper (so far).
it absolutely does not have "better gpu performance". that is a blatant lie.
Posted by Kiphanes Trophome
 - Yesterday at 22:11:21
Lunar Lake seems simply better than Panther Lake U.
Similar CPU performance. Better GPU performance. Better battery life. And cheaper (so far).
Posted by Redaktion
 - Yesterday at 21:56:01
Intel promised that Panther Lake would deliver the same power efficiency as the last generation Lunar Lake chip. While Panther Lake does well, our review of the ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 shows that this is not quite the case.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lunar-Lake-is-still-the-Intel-battery-life-king-ThinkPad-T14-Gen-7-vs-T14-Gen-6.1313676.0.html