Things the MacBook Air 13 M5/2026 has going for it over this:
+ Much better screen:
-> Sharper text/no matte oil coating effect (look at the subpixel array picture in this review..looks kinda nasty)
-> More lively/popping colors due to no oil coating
-> Better screen ratio
-> Brighter at 500 nits
-> higher resolution
-> Display can show more colors / covers Display P3 colorspace standard
(only the OLED on the ThinkPad is better, but it's even more expensive and it has its own disadvantages)

+ Better speakers: 4 speakers on the Air 13 and 6 speakers on the Air 15.

+ Weights less at 1.2 kg.

+ Much cheaper at $ 1099.

+ Higher memory bandwidth:
this: 108.8 GB/s = 128-bit * 6800 MT/s / 1000 / 8.
MB Air: 153.6 GB/s = 128-bit * 9600 MT/s / 1000 / 8.
(-> the Air is 41% faster)

+ Faster iGPU: 3dmark.com/search - Steel Nomad:
this: 622 Points (from notebookcheck.net/-.1193658.0.html).
MB Air: Average score: 1065.
(-> the Air is 71% faster)

+ Same quality keyboard: Lenovo reduced the key travel, so now their so called famous keyboard doesn't stand out anymore.

+ No fan that can clog up.

+ Slimmer case.

+ The Air looks arguably better.

Things the MacBook Air 15 (15.3 inch) M5/2026 has going for it over this:
+ Still cheaper at $ 1299 (you can get it 150 bucks cheaper still, new).

+ Bigger screen while weighting not more than this 14 inch one.

Things the ThinkPad has going for it:
+ Reparability (mostly theory, you are not going to do any repair yourself, the stats on this are known), but you can get Air with AppleCare and it's still cheaper.

+ It is less likely to break from a fall (tho there are many reddit posts where a ThinkPad broke from a fall (and where it didn't, sure)), but you can get Air with AppleCare and it's still cheaper.

+ The RAM is upgradable to 64 GB vs only up to 32 GB on the Air, which are not enough for agentic workflows based on Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M:

Quote from: reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sq94qx/is_anyone_getting_real_coding_work_done_with.. I've come to the conclusion that (1) 32768 is the biggest context I can get away with in an adequately smart model, and (2) it just ain't enough.

The SoC is much inferior (especially GPU wise) to old Lunar Lake chips. This is sad as Lunar Lake was never a perf champion.

16 GB + 512 GB SSD + dogshit display... 1800 EUR? hahaha ok

weight 90% for a 14" 1.5kg?? are you joking??
80% for this shittty screen??
91% for the chassis without a second ssd 2280 slot etc..?
and all with this insane price??
wtf