Quote from: Clueless on Yesterday at 09:13:56

Quote from: Xorx on Yesterday at 08:12:10What did you expect...

Is it supposed to boost minimum FPS, like 1% lows?

It can't magically boost your 1% lows. Those are defined by your real frames, not the generated ones.

There is no universe in which frame gen would ever be required for Counterstrike. The system requirements for CS are as low as feasibly possible to maximise engagement. Valorant is a better example.

Quote from: Xorx on Yesterday at 08:12:10What did you expect...

Is it supposed to boost minimum FPS, like 1% lows?

It depends on your base framerate.
When your base FPS is already low, Frame Generation just adds more fake frames and doesn't really reduce latency but keeps it pretty much the same.

FG has always been a tool for mid-to-high-end GPUs. It was never meant to magically turn a weak PC into a high-performance machine.

What did you expect...
The higher your base framerate, the lower your latency.

QuoteHigher frame rates may mask latency and uneven frame pacing, which makes performance harder to judge

That's literally the entire point of the tech. But frame generation has mostly been driven by gamers' own insane obsession with framerate.

Maybe just stop demanding stupid levels of FPS. Remember when 60FPS was cool? Now you have people buying 144hz monitors then upgrading to 240 then 360 the complain they can't get native 4K graphics.

To hell with NVIDIA. To hell with DLSS. To hell with Ai. To hell with Jensen.