News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by jdrch
 - March 15, 2026, 05:44:04
Better is better.
Posted by TheWerewolf
 - March 10, 2026, 01:58:28
My question would be: is this an arbitrary "go faster" thing or does this affect the vast majority of real world use cases? The price/performance curve isn't a straight line - it's exponential. That means the cost even for a small improvement at the top is very high and may not be worth it at all, making this very much a rich person's  0th World Problem.
Posted by jdrch
 - March 09, 2026, 18:30:54
This isn't surprising considering Samsung's slow camera upgrades over the years. It was bound to catch up with them at some point.
Posted by Redaktion
 - March 09, 2026, 13:26:25
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra performs better than its predecessor in the DxOMark camera analysis, but Samsung cannot keep up with the best competitors. Even the older Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max can achieve a higher score.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S26-Ultra-lands-behind-Apple-iPhone-16-Pro-Max-on-DxOMark-camera-leaderboard.1246032.0.html