News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Terror Byte
 - Today at 01:35:50
What a stupid article. 355H is entry level with only 4P cores and no E cores, and 4LP-E cores. E-cores of which the 358H has 8, are very powerful, with the same or better IPC than Raptor Cove P cores. So the 355H will literally have at best 40% of the performance as the 358H as the LP-E cores are useless for real workloads.

The only quasi-sensible comparison would be maybe against 336H.
Posted by Worgarthe
 - Today at 00:54:38
A lower clocked 8-core chip with less cache is slower than a higher clocked 16-core chip with more cache? Now that's something we don't see every day!! https://giphy.com/gifs/producthunt-mind-blown-blow-your-26ufdipQqU2lhNA4g
Posted by Redaktion
 - Yesterday at 22:50:38
Panther Lake-H has proven itself to be quite impressive thus far, but the lesser Panther Lake-U series loses a lot of what makes the architecture unique from predecessors.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-Core-Ultra-7-355-benchmarks-are-in-and-they-re-nowhere-near-as-good-as-the-Core-Ultra-X7.1227025.0.html