News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Chris808
 - Today at 22:15:40
@Worgarthe

Threadripper is £4600 Dude... lol
Posted by Hoddle
 - Today at 19:29:24
Quote from: Worgarthe on Today at 14:39:19Almost like it's in the same class as the Threadripper 9980X (which draws ~600W with PBO). Oh wait, it is! What a "surprise". Yet people expect it to be like a Lunar Lake or whatever...

What are Nova Lake's benches so we can compare them on a per watt basis? Oh wait, you have none.
Posted by Jod
 - Today at 19:25:10
Quote from: Worgarthe on Today at 15:29:36
Quote from: Joew on Today at 15:02:34Threadripper 9980x has 64 cores, 128 threads, each with AVX512 enabled, and a total of 4 memory channels and a lot dmore PCIe lanes. This thing is a toy compared to that.
Oh, you already live somewhere at the end of 2026 so you have some insight into this Nova Lake 52C CPU toy? Drop some benchmarks please, I'm looking to see comparisons against the mentioned 9980X...

You mentioned the 9980x, so you go ahead and find some benches. Onus is in you that these two parts should even be compared.
Posted by Jod
 - Today at 19:23:16
Quote from: Worgarthe on Today at 15:29:36
Quote from: Joew on Today at 15:02:34Threadripper 9980x has 64 cores, 128 threads, each with AVX512 enabled, and a total of 4 memory channels and a lot dmore PCIe lanes. This thing is a toy compared to that.
Oh, you already live somewhere at the end of 2026 so you have some insight into this Nova Lake 52C CPU toy? Drop some benchmarks please, I'm looking to see comparisons against the mentioned 9980X...

I don't think this is about benches but the difference is by segment. I am sure AMD will have their Zen 6 desktop parts that are the correct reference point of comparison. You drew an incorrect comparison to a workstation/HEDT part but Nova Lake is not that, so it should not consume more than one.
Posted by Prassel
 - Today at 15:38:36
QuoteThis 700+ W power consumption is reportedly with the power limits removed. So, expect a much lower but still significant PL2 power limit.

Precisely. Nothing more must be said. Case closed.
Posted by Worgarthe
 - Today at 15:29:36
Quote from: Joew on Today at 15:02:34Threadripper 9980x has 64 cores, 128 threads, each with AVX512 enabled, and a total of 4 memory channels and a lot dmore PCIe lanes. This thing is a toy compared to that.
Oh, you already live somewhere at the end of 2026 so you have some insight into this Nova Lake 52C CPU toy? Drop some benchmarks please, I'm looking to see comparisons against the mentioned 9980X...
Posted by Joew
 - Today at 15:02:34
Threadripper 9980x has 64 cores, 128 threads, each with AVX512 enabled, and a total of 4 memory channels and a lot dmore PCIe lanes. This thing is a toy compared to that.
Posted by Worgarthe
 - Today at 14:39:19
Almost like it's in the same class as the Threadripper 9980X (which draws ~600W with PBO). Oh wait, it is! What a "surprise". Yet people expect it to be like a Lunar Lake or whatever...
Posted by xmi
 - Today at 13:24:55
Buy a CPU, get a free space heater.
Posted by Steve94
 - Today at 11:42:45
So it's intel being intel... again
Posted by Redaktion
 - Today at 11:17:26
Intel's next-generation Nova Lake desktop CPUs are expected to land by the end of 2026. When the Core Ultra 400 desktop processors do release, the flagship 52-core CPU is reported to consume an absurd amount of power under full load.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Eye-watering-Intel-Nova-Lake-52-core-flagship-CPU-power-consumption-leaks.1223432.0.html