Quote from: Redaktion on Today at 20:12:12would consume around 56 W and 110 W on the Asus and HP, respectively.

This is running connected to power outlet. Running on battery, on balanced profiles - I would presume it being closer to half this for both, so around ~28w and ~55w.

It would be interesting to see if you could test performance when on battery to confirm this. As many are interested in gaming perf. while on battery.

Both kind of meh, tbh. Halo is too power hungry and expensive. PTL won't be in any real volume until closer to end of year, so essentially out of stock paper launch for several months. Though it is interesting seeing what gains of future laptops will look like.

Seems if you need something rn, the best deals are either kraken point, LNL, or Arrow Lake-H/HX.

QuoteIt'll be interesting to see how AMD's eventual successor to the Radeon 890M can compare against the super-efficient Panther Lake iGPU series.

Good question, because if Intel is using TSMC' 3N node for its iGPU chiplet and AMD for its APU (which contains the 890M iGPU) is using TSMC 4N, then Intel's power efficiency advantage should only be ~30% (4N to 3N -> 1 node power efficiency advantage), but the B390 is over 60% more power efficient (at a 25W power limit) and this is a 2 nodes advantage.

CP2077: 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off):
8060S is 71% faster, but power consumption was twice, did you confirm?

Test power efficiency for CP2077 Overdrive preset (yes, the 390B is going to be too weak for this preset). Maybe it could run Overdrive at 720p?

LH, yes, Strix Halo it a big, 256-bit wide, APU. While Panther Lake is 128-bit wide. This's almost half the bandwidth (9600 MT/s (PL) vs 8000 MT/s (SH)).

The 8060S is able to stay close in efficiency by utilizing several times the die area for the GPU. That's a big part of the reason why it is so rare (and expensive).