Quote from: Terror Byte on Today at 00:45:27The main takeaway is the 395 has 33% more cores and only delivers 15% more performance. Bandwidth constrained by still too slow memory. Needs LPDDR5X 10K+

Yep. But nobody seems to be able to get anything higher than LPDDR5x-9600 although Samsung announced LPDDR5x-10500 back in April 2024. Only been almost 2 years....

Came to say the same thing, what sort of clown thinks the 392 could touch the 395 in multithreaded workloads.

The main takeaway is the 395 has 33% more cores and only delivers 15% more performance. Bandwidth constrained by still too slow memory. Needs LPDDR5X 10K+

Quote from: citral on Yesterday at 20:53:07Are you retarded and/or did you resort to "AI" to write your articles?

It's a fucking 12/24 cores vs the 16/32 of the 395, at which point did you expect on par or better multithread score? Why make it sound disappointing?

The interesting part is if it performs better for gaming, less juice for cpu, more for iGpu.

Sadly, most probably it was AI writing it, yes.

Are you retarded and/or did you resort to "AI" to write your articles?

It's a fucking 12/24 cores vs the 16/32 of the 395, at which point did you expect on par or better multithread score? Why make it sound disappointing?

The interesting part is if it performs better for gaming, less juice for cpu, more for iGpu.