Using a GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop and giving it only 8 GB VRAM is one thing, but doing the same to a 5070 Laptop, another.
Only 8GB VRAM, this is not enough anymore (don't care how good the device is otherwise). U don't believe me? Just see e.g. Hardware Unboxed on YouTube (they were one of the first who exposed this. U probably didn't know, but Aussies have a big PC community, may be that's also why, and they [Hardware Unboxed] are honest) or this very recent news:
Quote from: videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-rtx-5060-ti-8gb-reportedly-faces-limited-supply-16gb-model-becomes-mainstream[..]
According to the report, recent sales of 8GB models have been weak, while the 16GB version has been selling at a steady pace. With many recent games using close to or above 8GB of VRAM even at 1080p settings, some users are avoiding the lower-capacity model. This has also been visible across AMD products in the same segment, where 8GB cards have been sitting in stock while 16GB versions move faster.
[..]
Wait for next year' Refresh, if you can, which will use 3 GB per GDDR7 chip, instead of the current 2 GB (8 GB VRAM will then become 12 GB VRAM). The 5090 Laptop with its 24 GB VRAM is only a 5080 GPU chip (=256-bit) in disguise, otherwise it would only have 16 GB VRAM: See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_RTX_50_series#Mobile, the same GB203 chip is being used for 16 GB and 24 GB configs: 256-bit / 32-bit per chip = 8 GDDR7 chips, once with 2 GB per chip (=16 GB VRAM) and once with 3 GB per chip (=24 GB VRAM). This is common knowledge.
QuoteThe contrast of the screen is also far below average - from my point of view is the unit not a good choice ... 
QuoteContrast (:1)    
602
Wow, indeed, well spotted.