News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Joe
 - Yesterday at 12:29:32
1. Yes, you get a very long battery life but only until the next Android version comes out. Had this with a few of their "Power" models. Each update reduces the SOT by ~20-30%
2. Build quality is good but the same can be said about many other competitors.
3. Their displays are okay, they used to have Samsung Super AMOLED panels on some of their devices but now they're buying from China.
The real reasons why people pick Motorola is good call quality (Most of them have great mics with efficient noise canceling), the OS isn't bloated and full of ads, it's closer to stock Android with some Moto additions,  and the Moto gestures are very practical and many really get used to them.
I'm disappointed that this phone is running on the efficient Dimensity 7300 and manages to get very warm and also in the UFS 2.2 memory, why not UFS 3.1?
Posted by DantePierttyr
 - October 10, 2025, 11:45:16
Nah, they killed the P2 and FM radio, the later every single device should have, it's basically an emergency tool.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 10, 2025, 11:00:03
Buying a cheap smartphone can be a risky business: cheap plastic housing, slow SoCs and dim screens count among the dangers. But Motorola shows that things can be different. We take a look at one of its affordable mid-range phone that we really like.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Three-reasons-why-Motorola-makes-one-of-the-best-affordable-mid-range-phones.1132401.0.html