Quote from: TruthIsThere on Today at 14:38:37foreign regulatory commentary

This was commentary by the an American citizen, legal scholar and head of FTC. What was "foreign" about this?

And even if it were "foreign" why would that even be relevant? The only thing that should matter is making things better for the American people (which this merger has clearly failed to do, btw). Let's say a ground breaking new medicine is made outside the US, that makes treatment far cheaper and saves lives. Are you seriously going to say, "no thanks, because it's foreign and not an American invention" despite it having the potential to save so many more American lives? Why would ideas outside the US be bad if it helps serve American people and make their lives better?

Also you do realize, that America is literally founded immigration. The founding fathers were literally immigrants. If you really want to take this moral high ground of accepting nothing foreign then perhaps you should deport yourself back to Europe and give your land back to the actual native Americans that your land originally belonged to.

You literally cannot be pissed or have any right to be, when it was your elites that have interfered in every countries affairs across the Globe (that's what you guys specialise in). Trump and Elon are part of that very same establishment but I don't hearing you b*tchin about them or their decision making.

This has got to be by far the dumbest take.

The MSM, along with Sony' shills, often fail to recognize the growing public sentiment then; that many people, particularly in the U.S., were dismissive of foreign regulatory commentary on US's companies and resist allowing domestic regulators to dominate the public narrative that they absolutely have no affiliated purpose in... but only control (Hillary Clinton's desired AO rating anyone).

That was the only reason why, for many, who supported the MS/Blizzard acquisition stood as one with MS.