Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Tranquil Byte

- September 22, 2025, 19:15:41

Quote from: Terror Byte on September 22, 2025, 03:19:45well behind

If only they would be well behind it pricing too, that would be nice.

Quote from: Constable Odo on September 22, 2025, 12:40:31Why does Apple always use a smaller capacity battery

It might have something to do with keeping the weight down as typically the battery is responsible for most of it.

Posted by RobertJasiek

- September 22, 2025, 15:51:22

Thin and light is Apple's aim while lying, and watching many journalists lie, about the fake thinness of the camera bump.

Posted by Constable Odo

- September 22, 2025, 12:40:31

Why does Apple always use a smaller capacity battery when the body is the same size as a similar-sized Android smartphone? Is Apple trying to save money?

Posted by Terror Byte

- September 22, 2025, 03:19:45

Hardly surprising as the Apple SoC is significantly more efficient than anything Qualcomm or Samsung has ever produced. I'll guarantee SD Gen 5 will also be well behind in performance per watt too.

Posted by Redaktion

- September 21, 2025, 15:17:04

Apple's new iPhone Air is equipped with a laughably small battery in a world where even compact phones sport 5,000 mAh batteries. In spite of that, the iPhone Air manages to offer solid battery life in hands-on tests—better than the Galaxy S25 Edge, and astonishingly close to the iPhone 17.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-iPhone-Air-outperforms-the-Galaxy-S25-Edge-in-battery-drain-tests-despite-capacity-disadvantage.1120146.0.html