News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by The Werewolf
 - July 14, 2025, 23:45:33
"And it seems to be quite accurate."

I think the right word there is "precise", not "accurate".

In reality, there are so many unknowns down to exactly how much dark matter or energy there is and exactly how it's causing expansion, are we in a single universe alone, a single universe with bubble sub-universes, a true multiverse of 3-branes, how does the quantum foam at the Planck level affect (or even cause) this expansion and so on, that any notion that we "know" with certainty (and thus accuracy) and can predict the progress of the universe as it ages in a little presumptuous.
Posted by Redaktion
 - July 14, 2025, 18:41:29
While many theories persist on this subject, scientists have just defined the date of the end and collapse of our universe based on the Big Crunch theory. And it seems to be quite accurate.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-date-of-the-end-and-collapse-of-the-universe-is-now-known.1057941.0.html