The nits are rated at 1500Hbm and 4500HDR brightness. Right.? Full HD+ 1080x2400 is up to 1200x2712. Screen to body ratio from 92% or 90.2% to 96.3%sbr.The display is quad curved unlike last years "endless edge". True color Pantone certified. With the slightest downgrade if you can really call it that to 120Hz over 144Hz. A 24Hz reduction in refresh rate for 50-70 or so more pixels per inch is not a problem with me. I am just wondering what an OEM would need to do with their displays for you to consider it an upgrade.? In this day and age. That is about as much an upgrade as one will see. Yet you say that Motorola DIDN'T upgrade the display. Al I missing something here.?

So on the display you say there is no 'upgrade'here. Well I consider full hd+ to 1.5k an upgrade. 144Hz down to 120Hz for the better resolution is a fair trade off any day. I have used both refresh rates and there is little to no difference whatsoever. It's Pantone certified this year. The screen to body ratio is up 5% over the Edge 50 Fusion. You yourself report that the boys are up to 4500. That's up from 1600 on last years model. I do not understand how with all of that. You start your display paragraph with there is no upgrade here. Why would you say there isn't an upgrade when literally the display was upgraded in every way possible but refresh rate.?